Multi-scale water balance analysis of a thawing boreal peatland complex near the southern permafrost limit in northwestern Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Permafrost thaw profoundly changes landscapes in the Arctic-boreal region, affecting ecosystem composition, structure, function and services and their hydrological controls. The water balance provides insights into water movement and distribution within a specific area and thus helps understand how different components of the hydrological cycle interact with each other. However, the water balances of small- (<10 1 km 2 ) and meso-scale basins (10 1 –10 3 km 2 ) in thawing landscapes remain poorly understood. Here, we conducted an observational study in three small-scale basins (0.1–0.3 km 2 ) of a thawing boreal peatland complex. The three small-scale basins were situated in the headwater portion of Scotty Creek, a meso-scale low-relief basin (drainage area estimated to range between 130–202 km 2 ) near the southern permafrost limit in the Taiga Plains ecozone in northwestern Canada. By measuring water losses (discharge and evapotranspiration [ET]), inputs (rainfall [ R ] and snow water equivalent [SWE]) and storage change (Δ S ), and by calculating runoff ( Q ), we (1) aimed to quantify the growing season water balances (May–September, 2014–2016) of the three small-scale headwater sub-basins. After (2) comparing monthly sub-basin and corresponding basin water losses through ET and Q , we aimed to (3) assess the long-term (1996–2022) annual basin water balances using publicly available observations of discharge (and thus calculated Q ), R and SWE in combination with simulated ET. (1) Growing season water balance residuals (RES) for the sub-basins ranged from −81 to +122 mm. The monthly growing season water balance for the sub-basin for which all water balance components throughout the 3 year study period were recorded exhibited large positive RES for May (+117 to +176 mm), since it included late-winter SWE routinely estimated in late March right before snowmelt. In contrast, lower monthly and negative RES were obtained for June–September (−41 to 0 mm). For two sub-basins, we provide two different drainage area estimates, highlighting the challenges associated with automated terrain analysis using digital elevation models (DEMs) in low-relief landscapes. Drainage areas were similar for one sub-basin, but they exhibited a fivefold difference for the other. This discrepancy was attributed to the high degree of landscape heterogeneity and resulting hydrological connectivity, with implications for Q calculations and RES. (2) Spring freshet contributed 41 % to 100 % (sub-basins) and 50 % to 79 % (basin) of the April–September Q . Spring freshet peaks were comparable, except for the driest year (2014), when the basin Q was more than 10 times lower than in the sub-basins. At both scales, ET was the dominant source of water loss, more than twice Q . (3) Over the long term (1996–2022), the increase in the basin runoff ratio (the ratio of runoff to precipitation) from 1996 to 2012 (0.1 to 0.5) has been attributed to the increased connectivity of wetlands to the drainage network due to permafrost thaw. However, the smaller mean and more variable runoff ratio from 2013 to 2022 may be due to wetland drying and/or changes in precipitation patterns. Overall, we demonstrate how the hydrological responses of rapidly thawing boreal peatland complexes – at both the sub-basin and basin scales – are shaped by complex factors that extend beyond year-to-year changes in precipitation and ET. Long-term hydrological monitoring is crucial to identify and understand potential threshold effects (e.g. changes in land cover and hydrological connectivity) and ecohydrological feedbacks affecting the local (e.g. subsistence activities), regional (e.g. water storage) and global ecosystem services (e.g. carbon storage) provided by thawing boreal peatland complexes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».