A-121 Analytical performance evaluation of the next generation Abbott enzyme assays on the Alinity c system
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Liver enzyme assays, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), are essential in clinical laboratories for assessing liver function, diagnosing liver diseases, and monitoring treatment efficacy. Thus, accurate measurement of these enzyme activities is crucial for clinical diagnostics. Recently, Abbott introduced a next generation of Alinity and Architect enzyme assays, incorporating a multianalyte calibrator (Consolidated Chemistry Calibrator, ConCC) with extended stability. For these new formulation assays, both ConCC and calibration factors are offered for all the assays except GGT, which had better performance with the ConCC calibrator. These assays achieve high Sigma metrics on the Alinity c system, minimizing variability and errors. This study evaluated the analytical performance of these newly developed next generation assays on the Abbott Alinity c platform. Methods Using 2 levels of quality control (QC) material (Bio-Rad Chemistry UA) and 3 pooled patient samples, we assessed imprecision by measuring these 5 samples twice per day (morning and afternoon), for five days. Acceptable imprecision and bias were determined based on the Accreditation Canada Diagnostics (ACDx) recommendations. Linearity testing consisted of 6 levels of commercially available linearity materials, with 3 replicates per level. Method comparison between the next generation assays and on-market conventional assays were evaluated in duplicates using patient specimens (n= 145 – 155) on the Abbott Alinity c platform. Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman plots were used for the method comparison analyses. The precision and bias (external standard) studies were used to calculate the Sigma-metric using the formula, Sigma-metric=(%TEa-|%bias|)/%CV. TEa was defined based on ACDx and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) recommendations. Results The Alinity next generation assays demonstrated acceptable imprecision, meeting the ACDx goals of ±2 U/L for concentrations =40 U/L and ±4% for concentrations >40 U/L for AST, ALT and GGT, and for ALP at ±4 U/L for concentrations =100 U/L and ±4% for concentrations >100 U/L. Furthermore, these assays exhibited linearity across the six concentration levels tested. All next generation Alinity clinical chemistry enzyme assays showed a Pearson*s R value of 1.0, indicating a strong linear correlation. The linearity slope ranged from 0.76 (ALP2) to 1.04 (AST2) whereas the y-intercept ranged from –59.40 (GGT2) to 8.78 (AST2). The majority of next generation assays performed at or above 6 Sigma. Good agreements were observed between the on-market assay and the next generation (ConCC and factor calibrated) assays. Conclusion The Alinity next generation assays (ALT2, AST2, GGT2 and ALP2) demonstrated acceptable performance for precision and linearity, with good agreement with the conventional factor-based assays on the Alinity c system. These next generation assays had a high sigma value; hence laboratories can expect excellent performance. The precision and method comparison agreement with the conventional assays were satisfactory.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle