MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4414821510 · doi:10.1093/sexmed/qfaf077

Frequency of lab HIV and self-reported STI history and its predictors among a sexually compulsive clinical sample: a cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4414821510 sur OpenAlex
Nisa Regina Bubola Lima, Isabelle Vera Vichr Nisida, Marco de Tubino Scanavino

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueSexual Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueSexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Établissements canadiensLondon Health Sciences CentreLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Mots-clésHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Sexual behaviorMen who have sex with menSexual historyClinical trialPrimary care

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background and aims Individuals with compulsive sexual behavior (CSB) are at increased risk for sexually transmitted infections (STI) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Aim To investigate the frequency of STIs and HIV in a CSB clinical sample and the associated predictors. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between 2012 and 2021 in a specialized outpatient clinic at a large tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. We disclosed the study through noticeboards in the institution and advertisements on the official website and social media. Participants underwent a psychiatric interview to assess CSB and exclusion criteria. Individuals who sought treatment for difficulty in controlling sexual impulses and got confirmation of a CSB diagnosis were included. Those who did not were included as controls. Healthy volunteers who sought to participate as controls and did not confirm CSB diagnosis were also included. Comprehensive laboratory tests were requested. We investigated sexual compulsivity, impulsivity, patterns of CSB, condomless anal and vaginal sex and sex under the influence of alcohol/drugs, self-reported STI diagnoses or history, and screening tests. Logistic regression analysis was used. Outcomes Laboratory results of HIV tests and self-reported STI diagnoses or history. Results A total of 275 participants (67.5%) met the criteria for CSB, and 132 (32.5%) were eligible as controls. The frequency of HIV in tested participants was 10.8% (n = 23) in the CSB group and 2.4% (n = 2) among controls. Regarding self-reported STI diagnoses or history, 43.9% of CSB outpatients and 17.8% of the control group reported it [χ2(1) = 25.58, P < .001]. The HIV-positive test was associated with self-identifying as gay or bisexual [OR 31.58, 95% CI 4.09-243.72, P < .05] and sex under the influence of drugs [OR 6.49, 95% CI 1.10-38.35] in the final multivariate analysis model, adjusted for other variables. Sexual compulsivity [OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.07, P < .05], excessive casual sex [OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.07-3.17, P < .05], and self-identifying as of African descent [OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.88, P < .05] behave as predictors of self-reported STI. Clinical Implications We suggest incorporating frequent and periodic screening tests for HIV/STI in the management protocols of CSB patients, considering the potential morbidity and social burden of STI. Strengths and Limitations To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the frequency of HIV in a sexually compulsive clinical sample using laboratory tests, including women and participants of diverse sexual orientations. However, the prolonged data collection time was a limitation and many outpatient CSB participants commonly avoided taking exams and even left before this step. Because many tests for non-HIV were missing, self-reported history data of STI were preferred. Sensitivity analyses suggest that sexual orientation may have a modifying effect on the relationship between other predictors and HIV, which should be explored in further studies. Conclusions the current study shows distinct predictors for HIV and STI considering the CSB clinical sample, pointing out specific clinical care and prevention.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,073
Tête enseignante GPT0,412
Écart entre enseignants0,339 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle