Multiple pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexisting normal fetus: systematic review and meta‐analysis of clinical outcomes from non‐randomized studies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT Objective Complete hydatidiform mole and coexisting normal fetus (CHMCF) is a rare condition for which there is significant heterogeneity in diagnosis, counseling and management of complications. The objective of this study was to summarize the prevalence of clinical outcomes in reported cases of CHMCF. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases from inception until 1 October 2024. Case series and cohort studies including at least three cases of histologically confirmed CHMCF were included. A random‐effects model was used for meta‐analysis of proportions and heterogeneity was estimated using Higgins' I 2 index. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist were used to assess study quality, while certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The study was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023431734). Results Quantitative synthesis included 19 studies and 417 cases of CHMCF. Diagnosis was made using ultrasound in 76.0% (95% CI, 58.5–90.6%) of cases and occurred in the first trimester in 52.7% (95% CI, 34.0–71.0%). Symptoms at diagnosis were present in 80.5% (95% CI, 66.1–92.3%) of cases, with vaginal bleeding being the most common symptom both at diagnosis and later in pregnancy. The pooled proportion of elective pregnancy termination was 48.8% (95% CI, 32.7–65.1%), with 6.2% (95% CI, 1.0–13.9%) due to maternal complications. The pooled proportion of live births was 46.5% (95% CI, 36.1–57.1%), with most being delivered by Cesarean section (71.2% (95% CI, 42.4–94.4%)). Preterm birth (< 37 weeks) occurred in 67.8% (95% CI, 44.7–88.1%) of cases, very preterm birth (< 32 weeks) in 12.4% (95% CI, 0.2–33.9%) and miscarriage (fetal death < 24 weeks) in 32.7% (95% CI, 26.1–39.6%). Pre‐eclampsia was present in 17.8% (95% CI, 5.9–32.7%) of cases and postpartum hemorrhage occurred in 42.7% (95% CI, 5.1–84.8%). A small‐for‐gestational‐age neonate (birth weight < 10 th percentile) was delivered in 40.6% (95% CI, 12.9–70.8%) of cases. Rates of neonatal and maternal mortality were negligible. The pooled proportion of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was 33.8% (95% CI, 25.6–42.5%); among elective terminations, continued pregnancies and live births, the rates were 14.1% (95% CI, 5.4–24.9%), 20.3% (95% CI, 12.0–29.9%) and 5.9% (95% CI, 1.9–11.2%), respectively. The evidence level according to GRADE was low to very low. Conclusions Pregnancies with CHMCF present a high risk of maternal, obstetric and neonatal complications, including miscarriage, pre‐eclampsia, small‐for‐gestational age, postpartum hemorrhage and preterm birth. The risk of developing gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was not clearly mitigated by early pregnancy termination. Early diagnosis, referral to a maternal–fetal medicine unit with expertise in trophoblastic disorders and extensive implementation of screening protocols for preterm birth and pre‐eclampsia are recommended to facilitate timely intervention aimed at outcome improvement. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,206 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,020 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».