MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4415050225 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.10.25337708

The impact of vaccine products, schedules and geographic regions on immunogenicity of pneumococcal vaccines in children under 2 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4415050225 sur OpenAlexafffund
Xinghui Chen, Sarah Tavlian, Kylie Carville, Nefel Tellioglu, Violeta Spirkoska, Natalie Carvalho, David J. Price, Patricia T. Campbell, Jodie McVernon

Notice bibliographique

RevuemedRxiv · 2025
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Établissements canadiensCentre for Global Health Research
Organismes subventionnairesInstitute of Infection and ImmunityChina Scholarship CouncilDepartment of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian Government
Mots-clésImmunogenicitySerotypeVaccinationAntibody responseVaccination scheduleAntibody

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Summary Background Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) cover only a proportion of disease-causing serotypes. In some settings, population-level introduction of PCVs has resulted in an increase in “non-vaccine” serotype incidence. Higher-valency PCVs were developed to address shifting disease-causing serotypes. We aim to systematically define the trends in vaccine immunogenicity and likely protection over time. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published to Jan 7, 2025, reporting immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses after PCV vaccination in healthy children <2 years. Outcomes were serotype-specific IgG geometric mean concentration (GMC) and seroresponse rate. We performed random-effects meta-analyses using log-transformed GMCs and logit-transformed seroresponse rates to generate pooled estimates by vaccine product, dosing schedule, and World Health Organization (WHO) region. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024484824). Findings We included 250 articles from 138 study groups involving 244 study arms. Pooled IgG GMCs for vaccine-included serotypes post-childhood-schedule exceeded the WHO-defined protective threshold (0·35 μg/mL), but varied by serotype, lowest for serotype 3-PCV20 (0·84 μg/mL; 95% confidence interval: 0·60–1·17). Post-childhood-schedule seroresponse rates were >95% for all serotypes except serotype 3 (84–92%). A general “downward trend” in IgG GMCs was observed with the increasing vaccine valency. IgG responses increased with the number of primary doses, and were further enhanced by a booster, although magnitude varied by serotype and vaccine. IgG responses post 1-primary dose were low, whereas GMCs post 2- or 3-primary doses exceeded protective thresholds for most serotypes. Booster-containing schedules (3+1, 2+1, 1+1) generally elicited higher post-childhood-schedule IgG response than primary-only schedule (3+0). We observed substantial regional variation of post-childhood-schedule serotype-specific IgG GMCs, with highest GMCs in the Western Pacific Region. Interpretation Vaccine immunogenicity varied by serotype, vaccine product, schedule and WHO region, and should be carefully considered when evaluating potential vaccination programs. Funding PhD Scholarship; Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Research in context Evidence before this study We implemented a targeted literature review strategy to identify prior evidence in PubMed on August 14, 2023, without time and language restrictions, using the following search strategies: ((streptococcus pneumoniae[Title]) OR (pneumococc*[Title]) AND (immun*[Title] OR antibod*[Title]) AND (review[Filter])). We identified six systematic reviews quantitatively evaluating the serotype-specific immune responses following pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) in infants. All reviews focused on PCV7, PCV10-GSK, and PCV13; none included the newer higher-valency PCVs (PCV15, PCV20) or the novel PCV10-SII. Two early reviews (2011) compared 2-dose versus 3-dose primary series in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), reporting differences in seroresponse rates — greatest for serotypes 6B and 23F — without accounting for specific vaccine products. Two reviews in 2014 further explored the impact of dosing schedules, vaccine product, and region on immune responses, but only a subset of vaccine-included serotypes was analysed. A 2020 review investigated regional variation in post-primary responses but was restricted to RCTs and did not assess post-booster immune responses. A 2023 review of head-to-head RCTs in infants comparing PCV7, PCV10-GSK and PCV13 found that 1-month post-primary serotype-specific IgG geometric mean ratios favoured PCV7 over either PCV13 or PCV10 for serotypes 4, 6B, 9V, 14, and 23F. Added value of this study PCV15 and PCV20 were developed in response to changes in patterns of disease-causing serotypes, whereas PCV10-SII was designed for developing countries with distinct serotype distribution. To date, however, no systematic review has synthesised all available PCV data and compared the immunogenicity of newer vaccines relative to earlier ones. As immunogenicity remains the cornerstone of vaccination recommendations in the absence of representative effectiveness studies, our study quantifies and compares immune responses to five widely used PCVs across alternative dosing regimens, populations, and epidemiological contexts. Implications of all the available evidence Vaccine immunogenicity varied by serotype, vaccine product, schedule and World Health Organization (WHO) region. Downward trend of serotype-specific IgG response was generally observed with increasing vaccine valency for most serotypes, indicating the importance of balancing vaccine serotype coverage and the magnitude of immune response for sustained population protection. This evidence should be considered when evaluating potential vaccination programs.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,014
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: Méta-analyse
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,023
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,076

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0140,036
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0230,048
Bibliométrie0,0080,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,347
Écart entre enseignants0,312 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuemedRxiv→Même sujetPneumonia and Respiratory Infections→Travaux en français237 207→