Impact of barrel stave osteotomy on cephalometric measurements in patients who have undergone endoscopic repair of sagittal craniosynostosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: The treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis typically involves endoscopic suturectomy (ES) to allow skull expansion, followed by postoperative helmet orthosis, resulting in an improvement in cranial deformity as assessed using the cephalic index (CI). The impact of variations in surgical technique on long-term CI outcomes is not well understood, and there is controversy regarding whether adding barrel stave osteotomy (BSO) to standard ES leads to greater improvement in the CI postoperatively. This combined approach is thought to improve cranial shape and overall clinical outcomes but may increase operative burden. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of BSO during ES on operative outcomes and postoperative cranial deformity in patients who underwent surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of children who had been treated with ES for sagittal craniosynostosis between 2010 and 2021 at British Columbia Children's Hospital. Demographics, operative outcomes, and postoperative longitudinal CI measurements were collected and compared between patients who had undergone ES with BSO (ES+BSO) and those who had undergone ES alone. Operative outcomes related to anesthesia and surgical time, blood loss, and hospital length of stay were analyzed, as were changes in the CI at various follow-up times. A mixed-effects model was used to compare longitudinal CI measurements between treatment groups, controlling for patient age, preoperative CI, and duration of helmet therapy. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included in the analysis, 67 treated with ES+BSO and 18 treated with ES. Operative outcomes, including length of hospital stay, operative time, time under anesthesia, blood loss, and need for transfusion did not differ significantly between treatment groups (p > 0.05). The mean follow-up for the last CI measurements was 56.0 months. While preoperative CI was similar for the two groups (mean 67.4 for ES+BSO vs 66.8 for ES, p = 0.61), CI was significantly higher in the ES+BSO group immediately postoperatively (p = 0.004) and at the 6-month (p = 0.01), 2-year (p = 0.02), and final (p = 0.002) follow-ups. A mixed-effects model revealed that the addition of BSO led to significantly greater CI measurements independent of age, preoperative CI, and helmeting duration (estimated effect size 2.21, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the addition of BSO to ES significantly improved immediate and long-term cranial deformity in patients with sagittal craniosynostosis, without increasing the operative burden.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».