Pericapsular nerve group block for intracapsular vs. extracapsular hip fracture
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is used increasingly for hip fracture analgesia in emergency departments [1-4]. Cadaveric and clinical studies suggest that, when performed with at least 20 ml of injectate, the PENG block provides analgesia for both intracapsular and extracapsular hip fractures, although greater volumes are associated with an increased risk of undesirable spread to the femoral nerve, resulting in quadriceps weakness [2, 5, 6]. No studies have yet compared the analgesic effect of the PENG block in intracapsular vs. extracapsular hip fracture. Koh et al. investigated the analgesic effect of PENG vs. supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block, which included a sub-analysis of intracapsular and extracapsular groups [7]. There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores between these groups, but the study was not powered for this outcome. However, a key limitation is the inclusion of subtrochanteric fractures, for which the PENG block is not indicated [2]. This likely underestimated the analgesic effect in the extracapsular group and amplified the between-group difference. We conducted a similar exploratory secondary analysis of our recent trial, which investigated the analgesic effect of the PENG block vs. infra-inguinal fascia iliaca block in the emergency department [8]. Among the 30 patients who received a PENG block with an injectate volume of 20 ml, 13 had an intracapsular fracture (subcapital or transcervical) and 17 had an extracapsular fracture (basicervical, intertrochanteric, simple pertrochanteric or multifragmentary pertrochanteric). We found that the interquartile range for visual analogue pain scale values was greater for extracapsular fractures, with nearly identical Q3 values between the two groups and a lower Q1 value in the extracapsular group (Fig. 1). We calculated pain intensity differences from visual analogue pain scale values at each time-point and the summed pain intensity differences. We then obtained the proportion of the summed pain intensity differences for the intracapsular and extracapsular groups as 68% (95%CI 53–83%) and 68% (95%CI 57–78%). These data suggest that the PENG block, performed with 20 ml injectate, may be as effective for extracapsular fractures as it is for intracapsular fractures. Nevertheless, the difference in the dispersion from median values may suggest a less consistent analgesic effect of the PENG block in extracapsular fractures, possibly due to higher variability in the injectate spread to the trochanteric area. We present these data descriptively due to our small sample size and because our study was not powered for this secondary analysis. Future adequately powered studies should clarify if for a given injectate volume, the PENG block results in different analgesic effects in intracapsular and extracapsular fractures. It would also be worthwhile investigating whether these fracture patterns require a different injectate volume for the PENG block to be effective. SDP receives lecture fees and royalties for the implementation of a nerve block simulator from Accurate Srl. The company had no role in the design, conduction or funding of this trial. No other competing interests declared.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».