ANALYSIS OF FIRE HAZARDS of OPERATING FUEL - POWERED GENERATORS DURING THE ENERGY CRISIS IN UKRAINE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The given article provides a comprehensive review of the issues related to the operation of fuel power generators in energy crisis conditions. The study is based on data from Ukraine, where, after beginning of the full-scale aggression of the russian federation in 2022, critical energy infrastructure facilities were destroyed or significantly damaged, leading to large-scale power outages across the country. In response to these challenges, the population began to use generators as autonomous power sources to meet their household needs. This has led to a simultaneous increase in the man-made risks associated with their use, including fire hazards, carbon monoxide poisoning, explosions of fuel systems, etc. The research covers a statistical analysis of the dynamics of fires over the past eight years (in particular, the time interval before and after the full-scale invasion of the aggressor country). The emphasis is on the period of 2022-2024, when the number of fires related to the use of electric generators increased to dozens per year. It is based on the official data of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine, according to which the main causes of such fires are short circuits and non-compliance with fire safety during the operation of electrical equipment. The paper analyzes the specifics of the use of electric generators in buildings and structures of various functional purposes, describes the main causes of fires during their use. It is found that the lack of differentiated standards for the placement and certification of equipment poses a potential threat to these facilities. Particular attention is paid to foreign incidents, in particular in the USA, Nigeria, Canada, India, and Australia, which demonstrate a similar typology of fire safety violations to Ukrainian realities, but in the context of effective regulatory control, they are more often localized in the early stages of fire development. In addition, the article highlights the problem of the lack of mandatory regulatory requirements in Ukraine regarding the location of generators, verification of equipment certification, and a national regulatory document on the rules for the arrangement and operation of fuel electric generators. With this in mind, the authors analyze the existing international standards governing the requirements for the safe installation, operation and maintenance of stand-alone power generators in countries with high fire safety standards. This comparison allows to identify gaps in the current Ukrainian legislation and to form a vision of the possible adaptation or integration of international experience into national practice in this area. Materials of the study can be used for further scientific understanding of the problem of operating fuel power generators, improving existing safety policies, developing regulatory documents for state supervision bodies, as well as in the work of designers and specialists in the field of fire safety.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».