Behaviorally relevant cell ensembles in rat motor cortex are replayed during sleep and implicate hippocampal involvement in motor skill learning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Motor memory is essential for our daily activities. It involves complex neural processes during learning and sleep. However, unlike explicit memory where its neural activation and role in memory consolidation are well-studied, the properties of cell ensembles for motor memory are less understood. In this study, we re-examined rats’ behavior and neural activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) and hippocampus while the animals were trained daily on a single-pellet reaching task. Recordings included both the training and 3 hr rest epochs before and after training. Behaviorally, the animals were classified into two learning types: rapid and gradual learners. Unsupervised cell ensemble detection on M1 neurons revealed that about 60% of the ensembles were modulated during reaching behavior. Those reach-related ensembles were further categorized into four types, and their replay was detected during both slow-wave sleep (SWS) and REM sleep. In SWS, replay preferentially occurred during spindles, especially slow-oscillation coupled spindles (SO-spindles). In addition, about 30% of the reach-related cell ensembles were modulated during the hippocampal sharp-wave ripples (SWRs). The direction of modulation and the temporal coupling between SWRs and SO-spindles depended on the training phase and the animals’ learning types. Our results demonstrate the replay of rats’ skilled-reaching memory during SWS and REM sleep and the possible involvement of the hippocampus through the modulation of M1 activations during SWRs. This study will advance our understanding of how neural activity patterns evolve during skilled-reaching learning and sleep, and help develop medical applications that leverage sleep’s memory functions. Significance Statement Most evidence for memory replay comes from hippocampal studies in which neural activity during rest is compared to a template constructed from activity recorded during a behavioral task. Here, we used an unsupervised ensemble detection on recordings from rat primary motor cortex (M1) that included both rest and a skilled reaching task. We discovered a variety of ensembles with different sizes and time scales. Many were related to reaching behavior and were replayed during sleep. Some M1 ensembles were also modulated by the hippocampal activity, suggesting their involvement in motor skill learning. This study will advance our understanding of motor memory and sleep and help develop medical applications that leverage sleep’s memory functions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».