MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4415363596 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.15.25337077

Durability of the Benefit of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Markedly Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A RECOVER Trial Report

2025· preprint· W4415363596 sur OpenAlexaff
Charles R. Conway, A. John Rush, Scott T. Aaronson, Mark Bunker, Charles M. Gordon, Mark S. George, Patricio Riva‐Posse, Rebecca M. Allen, Ziad Nahas, Christopher Kriedt, John Zajecka, David L. Dunner, João Quevedo, Yvette I. Sheline, Walter Duffy, Brian J. Mickey, Mary Stedman, Gustavo Alva, Lucian Manu, Quyen Tran, Charles F. Zorumski, Matthew Macaluso, Michael Banov, Cristina Cusin, Jeffrey I. Bennett, Jeffrey C. Way, Olivia Shy, Ying-Chieh Lee, Roger S McIntyre, Harold A. Sackeïm

Notice bibliographique

RevuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Langue
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueVagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesLivaNovaCarilion Clinic
Mots-clésVagus nerve stimulationAdjunctive treatmentQuality of life (healthcare)Major depressive disorderRandomized controlled trialAntidepressantDepression (economics)Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Importance Greater levels of treatment resistance in major depressive disorder (MDD) are associated with lower rates of initial benefit and higher rates of relapse (lower durability). Objective Characterize depressive symptoms, function, and quality of life (QoL) over 24 months of adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in participants with markedly treatment-resistant depression. Design Prospective, open-label, single-arm, long-term extension study (RECOVER) conducted from September 2019 to April 2025. Setting Outpatient. Participants Adults with moderate-severe MDD with ≥4 failed antidepressant trials in the current episode, randomized to blinded, adjunctive VNS for 12 months, who subsequently received open-label, adjunctive VNS for 12 additional months (N=214). Interventions VNS and concomitant psychotropic medications and interventional psychiatric modalities (electroconvulsive therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, ketamine/esketamine) were characterized over the 12-month extension. Main Outcomes and Measures The durability of benefit achieved at 12 months was assessed at 18 and 24 months for depressive symptoms (3 scales), daily function, QoL, a tripartite composite of all 3 domains, and the Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) scale (overall improvement). Loss of benefit and relapse were assessed, along with the emergence of meaningful benefit in participants without benefit at 12 months. Substantial benefit (at least 50% symptom reduction from baseline; CGI-I of 1 or 2; tripartite with at least 2 of 3 subscales evidencing benefit) and meaningful benefit thresholds for symptoms (at least 30% reduction from baseline), function, QoL, CGI-I, and the tripartite measure were set a priori . Results Most participants with substantial benefit maintained their benefit (18-month median=78.8%; 24-month median=79.0% across 5 measures), as did participants with at least meaningful benefit at 12 months (18-month median=83.1%; 24-month median=81.3% across 7 measures). Furthermore, many participants with no meaningful benefit at 12 months achieved it at 18 (median=30.6%) and 24 (median=37.8%) months. The strong maintenance of benefit was not accounted for by changes in psychotropic medications or interventional psychiatry modalities. Conclusions and Relevance Depressive symptom, daily function, and QoL benefits obtained after 12 months of adjunctive VNS were sustained in about 80% of participants continuing VNS. Approximately 30% with no meaningful benefit at 12 months accrued increased benefit over the subsequent year. Significance Statement Patients with markedly treatment-resistant major depression have low likelihood of benefiting from antidepressant treatments and high likelihood of rapid relapse if benefit is obtained. In 214 participants randomized in the RECOVER trial to active treatment with adjunctive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) therapy, outcomes after a second year of stimulation were examined for depressive symptom severity, function, and quality of life. Participants with meaningful benefit at 12 months maintained this level of benefit or better at 24 months at high rates (median ≥80% across all measures). Durability was strong for symptoms, function, and quality of life regardless of the threshold used to define benefit and was not attributable to changes in concomitant treatments. Moreover, a substantial proportion of participants had meaningful improvement at 24 months who did not at 12 months. In a sample characterized by profound chronicity and treatment resistance, active VNS was associated with exceptionally strong durability of benefit.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,053
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,014
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,352
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuemedRxivMême sujetVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchTravaux en français237 207