#3391 Pegcetacoplan treatment appears to halt disease progression in C3G and primary (idiopathic) IC-MPGN patients: results from the phase 3 VALIANT study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background and Aims C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) and primary (idiopathic) immune complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) are rare diseases where uncontrolled C3 activation results in excessive glomerular deposition of C3 breakdown products. Current treatments, such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids, are used off-label, primarily targeting inflammatory changes rather than the underlying disease mechanism. These treatments are associated with adverse effects and lack robust clinical evidence of efficacy. As a result, up to 50% of patients progress to kidney failure within 10 years. Pegcetacoplan (PEG) binds selectively to C3 and C3b to strongly block C3 activation by classical/lectin/alternative pathways, C3/C5 convertase activity and activation of downstream effectors. PEG targets the pathogenic process in C3G/primary IC-MPGN with the aim of stopping kidney damage. In the Phase 3 VALIANT study (NCT05067127) in pts aged ≥12 years with native or post-transplant recurrent C3G/primary IC-MPGN, PEG led to glomerular C3 clearance in 71% of pts and achieved significant and sustained reduction in proteinuria across all pt subgroups with stabilization of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Change in proteinuria has been proposed as a predictor of progression to kidney failure [1]. Registry data show that a ≥50% reduction in proteinuria over time correlated with a significantly lower risk of kidney failure in C3G pts [1]. Pts with urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) of <0.88 g/g 12 months after diagnosis have an 87% [2] reduction in kidney failure risk over 20 years. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the indicators suggesting a potential long-term protective effect of PEG in preventing kidney failure. Method Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive PEG (subcutaneous infusion twice weekly) or placebo (PBO) for 26 weeks as add-on to their stable treatment regimen. The primary endpoint was the log-transformed ratio of UPCR at Week 26 vs baseline. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of pts achieving a reduction in C3c staining on kidney biopsy and change in eGFR from baseline vs PBO. We present a pre-specified analysis on the effect of PEG on complement dysregulation and a post-hoc analysis on changes in proteinuria across the VALIANT population. Results Overall, 124 pts enrolled in VALIANT (63 PEG, 61 PBO). After PEG treatment, there was a rapid response in serum complement C3 and sC5b-9 from Week 4 that was maintained through 26 weeks. On treatment, C3 increased in all pts with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) change of 308.7 (94.7) mg/dL and soluble C5b-9 decreased with a mean (SD) reduction of 612.3 (614.7) ng/mL at Week 26 vs baseline, while no change was observed in PBO pts. Improvement in circulating complement biomarkers was associated with 25/35 (71%) PEG pts achieving 0 glomerular C3c staining at Week 26. Significant proteinuria reduction was observed as early as Week 4 in the PEG arm and remained stable up to Week 26 with no discernible change in UPCR over time in the PBO arm. Pts were categorized by proteinuria range at baseline and Week 26, and shift in proteinuria was evaluated. In the PEG arm, pt distribution across proteinuria ranges shifted towards lower values with 50.8% (32/63) achieving UPCR <1 g/g, including 31.7% (20/63) <0.5 g/g, and a decrease in proportion of pts in all higher UPCR ranges >1.5 g/g. In contrast, in the PBO arm at Week 26, there was no increase in the number of pts in the low proteinuria ranges while the proportion of pts in higher ranges either stabilized or increased, as expected (Figure). Conclusion PEG treatment led to an increase in serum C3 levels, a reduction in serum sC5b-9 and clearance of glomerular C3 deposition. Further, PEG treatment resulted in a significant and clinically meaningful decrease in UPCR to <0.5 g/g. These findings demonstrate a profound disease-modifying effect, regardless of baseline proteinuria levels. Based on registry data, the observed reduction in proteinuria across the cohort at 26 weeks suggests PEG treatment is likely to significantly lower the long-term risk of patients progressing to kidney failure.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».