SAT-530 Differences In Perspectives Of Weight Management Among People In The US And Canada With T2D By BMI And Sex
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Disclosure: M. Ross: Eli Lilly & Company. S. Mulnick: Eli Lilly & Company. K. Boye: Eli Lilly & Company. A. Samuelson: Eli Lilly & Company. V. Thieu: Eli Lilly & Company. C. Longuet: Eli Lilly & Company. J. Glass: Eli Lilly & Company. M. Hoog: Eli Lilly & Company. Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects approximately 35 million Americans and three million Canadians. The link between T2D and obesity has been well established and guidelines for treating T2D include recommendations to support patients in healthy weight reduction. This study explored the perspectives of people residing in the US and Canada with T2D across BMI categories regarding the perceived value of reaching a lower weight and how this would impact their lives. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional survey informed by qualitative interviews was administered in English to adults in the US and Canada with T2D. Enrollment ensured a sample representative of the T2D population by BMI according to US census data. The survey explored weight management experience, impacts of T2D and weight on quality of life (QOL), and perceived value of 5%, 10%, and 20% weight reductions. Participants defined their dream, achievable, acceptable, and unsuccessful body weights, standardized as a proportion of their reported current weight. Results were summarized descriptively. Chi-square tests and t-tests assessed for significant differences between BMI categories and by sex at birth (p<0.05). Results: The 746 participants (US=388, Canada=358) were 45% female, 43% retired, and 77% college-educated or higher. Mean (SD) BMI was 32.8 kg/m2 (8.2) and was higher among female participants (female=35.0 kg/m2 (9.4); male=31.0 kg/m2 (6.5); p<0.001). 41% had a BMI<30 kg/m2 and 13% had a BMI<25 kg/m2. The majority (70%) self-reported an HbA1c <7%. Nearly all (93%) felt weight management was important to managing their T2D, regardless of BMI. Most (66%) reported currently trying to lose weight and thinking about trying to lose weight at least multiple times each week over the last 2 years, especially those with higher BMIs (p<0.001). A higher BMI was also associated with more impacts of weight on T2D (emotional well-being, medical/health complications, physical/mobility limitations, sleep, daily activities, social and financial). Participants with higher BMIs desired greater weight reduction than those with lower BMIs when defining their dream, achievable, acceptable and unsuccessful weight goals and were more likely to expect a positive and meaningful impact on their life with 5%, 10%, and 20% weight reductions. Statistical differences between male and female sex at birth were also observed, as female participants reported more impacts of weight on T2D, struggling to lose weight, and desiring greater weight reduction than male participants. Conclusion: Participants with T2D positively valued weight reduction and anticipate it to lead to improvements in their overall T2D management and QOL. As the percentage of weight reduction increased, those with higher BMIs and female participants perceived greater meaningfulness and more positive impacts. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».