SUN-071 Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Osilodrostat in Patients with Cushing’s Disease in the LINC Rollover Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Disclosure: R.J. Auchus: Corcept Therapeutics, received grants and personal fees, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, received grants and personal fees, Diurnal Ltd, received grants and personal fees, Neurocrine Biosciences, received grants and personal fees, Sparrow Pharmaceuticals, received grants and personal fees, Spruce Biosciences, received grants and personal fees, Recordati Rare Diseases, received grants and personal fees, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, received grants and personal fees, Adrenas Therapeutics, received personal fees, Besins Pharmaceuticals, received personal fees, H Lundbeck A/S, received personal fees, Novo Nordisk, received personal fees, Quest Diagnostics, received personal fees. P. Witek: Berlin Chemie, received travel grants and speaker fees, Ipsen, received travel grants and speaker fees, Merck-Serono, received travel grants and speaker fees, Novartis, received travel grants and speaker fees, Novo Nordisk, received travel grants and speaker fees, Recordati Rare Diseases, received travel grants and speaker fees, Strongbridge Biopharma, received travel grants and speaker fees. M.A. Bex: Recordati Rare Diseases, consultancy and received travel grants. Y. Yu: None. Z. Belaya: None. A. Lacroix: Corcept Therapeutics, received grants and personal consulting fees, Novartis, received grants and personal consulting fees, Pfizer, received grants and personal consulting fees, Recordati Rare Diseases, received grants and personal consulting fees. C.M. Scaroni: HRA, received occasional consulting honoraria, Novartis, received occasional consulting honoraria, Pfizer, received occasional consulting honoraria, Recordati Rare Diseases, received occasional consulting honoraria, Sandoz, received occasional consulting honoraria. Y. Hwang: None. P. Kadioglu: None. A. Piacentini: Recordati, employee. A. Mueller: Recordati, employee. R. Pivonello: Corcept Therapeutics, received research funding and served as a consultant, Neurocrine Biosciences, received research funding, Recordati Rare Diseases, received research funding and served as a consultant, Spruce Bioscience, received research funding, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge Biopharma), received research funding, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, served as a consultant, H Lundbeck A/S, served as a consultant. Introduction: The LINC clinical trial program demonstrated that osilodrostat is effective and well tolerated in patients with Cushing’s disease (CD); however, lifelong treatment is often required. The open-label, multicenter LINC rollover (NCT03606408) study evaluated long-term osilodrostat safety and effectiveness in patients with CD. Methods: The study was planned to be open for ∼5 years (or until December 31, 2023 in the UK). Participants benefiting from osilodrostat treatment after completing either the LINC 2, LINC 3 or LINC 4 trial extension phases were eligible for inclusion. Participants continued in the rollover until osilodrostat no longer provided (investigator-judged) clinical benefit, became commercially available in their country, or one of the protocol-defined discontinuation criteria was met. Participants attended quarterly visits for safety/clinical benefit assessments. The primary objective was to evaluate long-term safety of osilodrostat treatment, assessed by frequency of adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs (SAEs). Cumulative data are reported from parent study baseline (BL) to rollover end, unless otherwise stated. Results: 127 participants entered the rollover (mean [SD] age: 41.3 years [12.4]; female: 74.8%). Median (min–max) osilodrostat exposure and dose was 5.0 (1.7–8.6) years and 4.9 (1.0–46.0) mg/day. All patients experienced ≥1 AE; 86.6% (n=110) were considered treatment related, most commonly (≥25% of patients) nausea (30.7%, n=39), adrenal insufficiency (AI; 28.3%, n=36) and fatigue (28.3%, n=36). SAEs were reported in 44.9% (n=57) of participants; 8.7% (n=11) were considered treatment related, most commonly AI (4.7%, n=6). AEs related to accumulation of adrenal hormone precursors were reported in 65.4% (n=83), hypocortisolism in 55.9% (n=71), pituitary tumor enlargement in 8.7% (n=11), and arrhythmogenic potential and QT prolongation in 5.5% (n=7). During the rollover, 22.0% (n=28) discontinued osilodrostat; 3.9% (n=5) discontinued because of treatment-related AEs, most commonly AI (n=3). At the end of osilodrostat treatment, 78.0% (n=99) continued to receive clinical benefit. From BL to week (W) 12 of the parent studies, mean urinary free cortisol levels decreased from 561.5 nmol/24 h (4.1 x upper limit of normal [ULN]) to 85.0 nmol/24 h (0.6 x ULN), mean glycated hemoglobin levels decreased from 5.8% to 5.6%, and mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 130.7 mmHg to 123.2 mmHg. These parameters then generally remained within normal range during the study. Body weight generally decreased over time. Potassium and sodium levels remained stable and normal throughout the study. Conclusion: The LINC rollover study complements existing evidence demonstrating that osilodrostat is well tolerated and provides sustained effects in patients with CD during long-term treatment (for up to 8.6 years); no new safety signals were identified. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».