MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4415450335 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.1656

SUN-071 Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Osilodrostat in Patients with Cushing’s Disease in the LINC Rollover Study

2025· article· en· W4415450335 sur OpenAlexaff
Richard J. Auchus, Przemysław Witek, Marie Adela Bex, Yerong Yu, Zhanna Belaya, André Lacroix, Carla Scaroni, Yoon-a Hwang, Pınar Kadıoğlu, Andrea Piacentini, Arnd Mueller, Rosario Pivonello

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Organismes subventionnairesIpsenNovo NordiskH. Lundbeck A/SRecordati Rare DiseasesNeurocrine BiosciencesPfizer
Mots-clésPersonal carePersonal accountPersonal protective equipmentPersonal lifeRollover (web design)Personal injury

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: R.J. Auchus: Corcept Therapeutics, received grants and personal fees, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, received grants and personal fees, Diurnal Ltd, received grants and personal fees, Neurocrine Biosciences, received grants and personal fees, Sparrow Pharmaceuticals, received grants and personal fees, Spruce Biosciences, received grants and personal fees, Recordati Rare Diseases, received grants and personal fees, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, received grants and personal fees, Adrenas Therapeutics, received personal fees, Besins Pharmaceuticals, received personal fees, H Lundbeck A/S, received personal fees, Novo Nordisk, received personal fees, Quest Diagnostics, received personal fees. P. Witek: Berlin Chemie, received travel grants and speaker fees, Ipsen, received travel grants and speaker fees, Merck-Serono, received travel grants and speaker fees, Novartis, received travel grants and speaker fees, Novo Nordisk, received travel grants and speaker fees, Recordati Rare Diseases, received travel grants and speaker fees, Strongbridge Biopharma, received travel grants and speaker fees. M.A. Bex: Recordati Rare Diseases, consultancy and received travel grants. Y. Yu: None. Z. Belaya: None. A. Lacroix: Corcept Therapeutics, received grants and personal consulting fees, Novartis, received grants and personal consulting fees, Pfizer, received grants and personal consulting fees, Recordati Rare Diseases, received grants and personal consulting fees. C.M. Scaroni: HRA, received occasional consulting honoraria, Novartis, received occasional consulting honoraria, Pfizer, received occasional consulting honoraria, Recordati Rare Diseases, received occasional consulting honoraria, Sandoz, received occasional consulting honoraria. Y. Hwang: None. P. Kadioglu: None. A. Piacentini: Recordati, employee. A. Mueller: Recordati, employee. R. Pivonello: Corcept Therapeutics, received research funding and served as a consultant, Neurocrine Biosciences, received research funding, Recordati Rare Diseases, received research funding and served as a consultant, Spruce Bioscience, received research funding, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge Biopharma), received research funding, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, served as a consultant, H Lundbeck A/S, served as a consultant. Introduction: The LINC clinical trial program demonstrated that osilodrostat is effective and well tolerated in patients with Cushing’s disease (CD); however, lifelong treatment is often required. The open-label, multicenter LINC rollover (NCT03606408) study evaluated long-term osilodrostat safety and effectiveness in patients with CD. Methods: The study was planned to be open for ∼5 years (or until December 31, 2023 in the UK). Participants benefiting from osilodrostat treatment after completing either the LINC 2, LINC 3 or LINC 4 trial extension phases were eligible for inclusion. Participants continued in the rollover until osilodrostat no longer provided (investigator-judged) clinical benefit, became commercially available in their country, or one of the protocol-defined discontinuation criteria was met. Participants attended quarterly visits for safety/clinical benefit assessments. The primary objective was to evaluate long-term safety of osilodrostat treatment, assessed by frequency of adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs (SAEs). Cumulative data are reported from parent study baseline (BL) to rollover end, unless otherwise stated. Results: 127 participants entered the rollover (mean [SD] age: 41.3 years [12.4]; female: 74.8%). Median (min–max) osilodrostat exposure and dose was 5.0 (1.7–8.6) years and 4.9 (1.0–46.0) mg/day. All patients experienced ≥1 AE; 86.6% (n=110) were considered treatment related, most commonly (≥25% of patients) nausea (30.7%, n=39), adrenal insufficiency (AI; 28.3%, n=36) and fatigue (28.3%, n=36). SAEs were reported in 44.9% (n=57) of participants; 8.7% (n=11) were considered treatment related, most commonly AI (4.7%, n=6). AEs related to accumulation of adrenal hormone precursors were reported in 65.4% (n=83), hypocortisolism in 55.9% (n=71), pituitary tumor enlargement in 8.7% (n=11), and arrhythmogenic potential and QT prolongation in 5.5% (n=7). During the rollover, 22.0% (n=28) discontinued osilodrostat; 3.9% (n=5) discontinued because of treatment-related AEs, most commonly AI (n=3). At the end of osilodrostat treatment, 78.0% (n=99) continued to receive clinical benefit. From BL to week (W) 12 of the parent studies, mean urinary free cortisol levels decreased from 561.5 nmol/24 h (4.1 x upper limit of normal [ULN]) to 85.0 nmol/24 h (0.6 x ULN), mean glycated hemoglobin levels decreased from 5.8% to 5.6%, and mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 130.7 mmHg to 123.2 mmHg. These parameters then generally remained within normal range during the study. Body weight generally decreased over time. Potassium and sodium levels remained stable and normal throughout the study. Conclusion: The LINC rollover study complements existing evidence demonstrating that osilodrostat is well tolerated and provides sustained effects in patients with CD during long-term treatment (for up to 8.6 years); no new safety signals were identified. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,205

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,261
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the Endocrine SocietyMême sujetPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207