Efficacy of the Web-Based Gamified Infection Control Training System on Practices for Health Care Workers in Residential Care Homes: Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Staff working in residential care homes (RCHs) have played a significant role in preventing the spread of infection among residents, visitors, and staff. Providing continuous professional training to the staff is essential. Current infection control training mostly rests on short educational talks or one-to-one reminders in the RCHs. A blended mode of online interactive games and face-to-face consultations was now proposed as a new way to conduct infection control training in the RCHs. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the efficacy of the Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) on infection control practices and self-reported knowledge, attitude, and practices of standard precautions among health care workers in RCHs. METHODS: A 2-arm, single-blinded, parallel cluster randomized controlled trial was designed, and 30 RCHs were recruited and randomized into an intervention group to receive the BGCTS and a control group to receive usual care on infection control training. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and infected cases in the homes, 17 RCHs refused or delayed the on-site observations. The BGCTS intervention, developed based on "The COVID-19 Risk Communication Package for Healthcare Facilities" of the World Health Organization, consists of two parts: (1) an eHealth mode of a 120-minute web-based training system covering 8 topics, delivered in short-clip videos and games, and (2) two 30-minute face-to-face interactive sessions for concept clarification. The 2 infection control practices, "use of gloves and personal protective equipment (PPE) and performing respiratory hygiene" and "hand rub," were assessed by on-site unobtrusive observations, and self-reported infection control practices and knowledge and attitude toward infection control were measured via online survey post intervention. RESULTS: A total of 212 staff from 13 RCHs were involved in the analysis, with 7 RCHs from the intervention group (n=114) and 6 RCHs from the control group (n=98). A significantly greater increase in the proportions of proper use of gloves and PPE and respiratory hygiene performance (β=.195, 95% CI 0.046-0.344; P=.02) and properly performed hand rub (β=.068, 95% CI 0.005-0.132; P=.04) was observed in the intervention group. The changes in the self-reported outcomes were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: BGCTS improved RCH staff's performance in 2 infection control practices by objective measurement, "gloves and PPE use and performance in respiratory hygiene" and "hand rub." BGCTS was shown to be an effective training, although it was a 2-week intervention. The BGCTS did not perform better than infection control briefing sessions in self-reported infection control knowledge, attitude, and practices. This electronic-based infection control training with 2 intensive interactive sessions has good potential to be adopted as regular training in RCHs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04783025; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04783025.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».