Knowledge and practice of breast self-examination and associated factors among women with breast cancer in Kabul, Afghanistan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide, and it has poor prognosis if diagnosed at late stages. Common breast cancer detection methods include mammography, clinical breast exams (CBE), and breast self-examination (BSE). Breast self-examination is the most cost-effective strategy for early detection in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the knowledge and practice of breast self-examination, along with associated factors, among women with breast cancer visiting Ali Abad Teaching Hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan in 2025. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 290 Afghan women aged 20-80 who were either currently or previously admitted to the Oncology department of Ali Abad Teaching Hospital for regular follow-ups or treatment. Data was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire between January and February 2025. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine the associations between BSE knowledge, BSE practice, and potential explanatory factors. Those that showed significant associations in the bivariate analyses were considered potential confounders and included in multivariable logistics regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 42.9 ± 14.7. Majority of the participants were illiterate (83.8%) and unemployed (95.9%). Women with education of secondary level or higher were more likely to practice BSE than those who were illiterate (AOR: 3.65, 95% CI: 1.06-12.76). Participants with good knowledge level were more likely to practice BSE than those who had a poor knowledge of BSE (AOR: 5.28, 95% CI: 2.45-12.48). In addition, women who had heard of BSE were more likely to practice it compared to those who had not (AOR: 4.31, 95% CI: 1.37-19.25). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, education, knowledge score, and awareness of BSE (i.e., having heard of BSE) were selected as important predictors for practice of BSE via both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. While about 50% of participants demonstrated good knowledge of BSE, only 18% were practicing it, and among those who did, only about 30% were performing it at the right time and frequency. These findings highlight the importance of educational programs with an aim to increase breast cancer awareness among women in Afghanistan, and to promote breast self-examination as a low-cost, accessible tool for early detection - helping to alleviate cancer burden in the country.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».