Feasibility of a tablet computer based food record for self-assessment of nutritional intake in geriatric rehabilitation patients: a pilot study (Preprint)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Nutritional status is an influencing factor for functional status and rehabilitation outcome in geriatric rehabilitation patients. Although there is evidence for the potential of eHealth interventions in geriatric rehabilitation patients in general, the evidence for eHealth interventions with focus on nutrition is scarce. In other target groups with older people, eHealth applications to support nutrition, such as computer-based food records, have been used successfully. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> Therefore, the aim of this study was to verify if it is feasible for geriatric rehabilitation patients to independently use a tablet computer based food record (e-food record) in order to document their food and beverage intake. The e-food record was developed in advance and tailored to the age- and disease-specific needs of geriatric rehabilitation patients. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> This prospective pilot study investigated the general feasibility of an e-food record in older adults (≥ 70 years) in a geriatric rehabilitation center in Germany. It was tested whether the e-food record could be independently used by the participants over three days. Furthermore, the usability of the e-food record was assessed by the System Usability Scale (SUS, 0-100 points) after usage. To compare nutritional data, the participants recorded their consumption of food and beverages by the e-food record and by a 24h recall for the same time period and mean difference was calculated as follows: value of 24h recall minus value of e-food record. As the study was characterized as pilot the data analysis was descriptive. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> 17 out of 25 patients (35.3 % female, mean age 79.5 ± 3.7 years) kept the e-food record independently over the study period. Mean SUS score of the e-food record was 76.0 ± 11.3 points. Data sets of nine participants (mean age 78.2 ± 2.9 years, 55.6 % female) were analyzed in terms of nutritional data. Mean difference in energy, protein and fluid intake by the 24h recall compared to the e-food record were 4.9 ± 10.2 kcal per kg body weight (bw), 0.1 ± 0.3 g per kg bw and 4.9 ± 9.4 g per kg bw respectively. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The use of an e-food record is generally feasible for geriatric rehabilitation patients characterized by low technical experience, high mean age and high rate of functional impairment. Underreporting was observed for the e-food record compared to the 24h recall with regard to energy, protein and fluid intake. Aspects for further development of the e-food record were identified to enable evaluation on a larger sample. Following successful evaluation, the e-food record could be used within nutrition therapy in the future to increase the efficiency of the nutritional therapy process. </sec> <sec> <title>CLINICALTRIAL</title> German Clinical Trials Register; Number: DRKS 00014370; http://www.bfarm.de/DE/Das-BfArM/Aufgaben/Deutsches-Register-Klinischer-Studien/_node.html </sec>
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».