Movements and survival of hatchery reared juvenile cisco (Coregonus artedi) in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cisco (Coregonus artedi) were historically abundant throughout Lake Huron, including Saginaw Bay, but only a few remnant populations remain in northern Lake Huron today. Reestablishment of cisco is an important component of management plans to restore sustainable fisheries in Lake Huron. Cisco restoration efforts have focused on the release of hatchery-reared fish, but the fate and behavior of stocked fish after release is unknown. Mortality due to predation and behavior of hatchery-reared fish after release may influence success of restoration stocking programs. Acoustic telemetry tags with predation sensors show promise for tracking movements and survival of juvenile fish; however, guidelines for designing receiver arrays to capture movements and determine the fate of juvenile fish are not well-established. We examined whether an acoustic receiver array with approximately 20 km2 of coverage was sufficient to determine movements and fate of cisco during the first month after release. We implanted 26 juvenile cisco (mean total length = 161 mm) with acoustic tags equipped with a sensor to detect predation. Thirteen fish (50%) moved more than 4 km from the release location and out of the array, seven fish (27%) were consumed by predators while in the array within 17 days of release, and the fates of six fish (23%) were unknown. Of fish that left the array, 50% left between 4 and 7 days after release. No fish were detected after 17 days after release. Cisco moved with water currents during the first day after release, but this was not observed in subsequent days. Concurrent with fish release, detection range was estimated from stationary tags at three locations within the receiver array. Daily estimates of detection range were greater than 50% at 250 m during October 2021. This study provides evidence that hatchery-reared juvenile cisco can move more than 4 km within 17 days of release but are vulnerable to predation. To fully quantify sources of mortality and spatial extent of movements by hatchery-reared cisco, future acoustic telemetry studies will require a receiver array designed to track movements of tagged fish and their predators over larger distances than monitored in this study.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».