A31 Reimagining Clinical Education: Building a Multimodal Simulation Program to Advance Clinical Readiness in Undergraduate Nursing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Across the globe, healthcare systems are experiencing rapid transformation, driven by advances in technology, increasing patient acuity, and evolving professional standards [1]. These shifts have elevated the expectations placed on newly graduated nurses, particularly in their ability to demonstrate critical thinking and clinical judgment. This shift has highlighted the need for innovation in clinical education. Recognizing these challenges, a Faculty of Nursing in Canada saw the opportunity to fundamentally reimagine its approach to clinical education through the intentional development and implementation of an innovative simulation program. The goal was to transition from sparse, ad hoc use of simulation to the comprehensive use of high-quality multimodal simulation to promote clinical judgment and critical thinking. Methods: A simulation program was developed and integrated across the undergraduate nursing curriculum. The program incorporates three simulation modalities: in-person simulation, immersive virtual reality simulation, and screen-based virtual simulation. Informed by the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning’s Healthcare Standards of Best Practice [2], the design is grounded in progressive complexity, aiming to create coherent and scaffolded learning experiences. The faculty engaged in detailed curriculum planning to support the development of consistent simulation experiences throughout all program years. Collaboration and iterative feedback informed implementation. Results: The completed program provides students with over 100 simulation experiences throughout the undergraduate curriculum. These simulations expose learners to diverse clinical contexts mirroring global health priorities and challenges. The program’s standardized design has fostered faculty development and enhanced alignment across courses, promoting a more cohesive and integrated clinical curriculum. Discussion: This initiative offers a replicable model for institutions seeking to modernize nursing education and better prepare students for the complexities of contemporary healthcare. The deliberate integration of multimodal simulation into the undergraduate nursing curriculum has transformed clinical education at this institution. Ethics Statement: As the submitting author, I can confirm that all relevant ethical standards of research and dissemination have been met. Additionally, I can confirm that the necessary ethical approval has been obtained, where applicable References 1. Gordon R, Riley J, Dupont D, Rogers B, Witherspoon R, Day K, Horsley E, Killam L. Facilitator development for pre-registration health professions simulation: A scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2025;23(4):812–21. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00130. 2. Watts PI, Rossler K, Bowler F, Miller C, Charnetski M, Decker S, Molloy M, Persico L, McMahon E, McDermott D, Hallmark B. Onward and Upward: Introducing the Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice. Clin Sim Nurs. 2021;58:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.006.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».