MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4415834885 · doi:10.1186/s12978-025-02158-z

Epidemiology of infertility and coping mechanisms in Ethiopia, 2025: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4415834885 sur OpenAlex
Yilkal Dagnaw Melesse, Haile Amha, Asmamaw Getnet, Atsede Alle Ewunetie, Aysheshim Asnake Abneh, Getnet Gedif, Anteneh Lamesgen, Abebaw Abeje Muluneh

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueReproductive Health · 2025
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueReproductive Health and Technologies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInfertilityPublic healthEpidemiologyReproductive medicineCoping (psychology)Systematic reviewChecklistReproductive healthSocial stigma

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Infertility is much more than a quality-of-life concern. Its consequences stream into public health domains such as psychological distress, social stigma and marital disagreements. The estimation of infertility is one of the most crucial activities concerning informing policymakers. Therefore, this review was conducted to estimate the pooled prevalence of infertility and coping mechanisms in Ethiopia. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guideline to adhere to standards in conducting and reporting of evidence synthesis. An internet-based search of noninterventional studies in Ethiopia was performed in CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. A total of 332 studies were screened, and only 11 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Studies were included if they described the prevalence and/or coping mechanisms of infertility. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist were used for quantitative and qualitative studies, respectively. The random-effects meta-analysis was done in Stata version 17, and forest plots, test of heterogeneity, and funnel plots were all generated. The pooled prevalence of lifetime and/or specific period of infertility was 25.77% [95% CI: 20.10, 31.45], with a heterogeneity index (I2 = 99.48, P = 0.00). The subgroup prevalence of primary infertility was 22.76% [-0.95–46.47], with heterogeneity (I2 = 99.54, p = 00), and that of secondary was 12.67% [9.14–16.20], with I2 = 98.57, p = 0.00. Spiritual activity, medical treatment, cultural practice, seeking support from family, adoption, acceptance, having a godchild, estranged social life, helplessness, extramarital engagement, and marital separation were the identified coping mechanisms. Compared with the global standard, the pooled prevalence of infertility in Ethiopia is relatively high. Most of the identified coping strategies of infertility were problem-focused mechanisms. The identified coping mechanisms were grouped in the following main themes: (i) seeking medical treatment, (ii) religious/spiritual practices, (iii) seeking social support, (iv) using cultural remedies, (v) acceptance, and (vi) avoidance/harmful behaviors. Policy makers, health authorities and professionals should improve the delivery of infertility prevention and treatment services and ensure coping support is culturally sensitive and integrated with the national health strategy. Infertility is unable to be pregnant after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sex. It can be a primary or secondary type. It leads to distress, social isolation and even marital separation. Estimating infertility is one of the most crucial activities for informing policymakers. Therefore, this review was conducted to determine the prevalence of infertility and coping methods in Ethiopia. The search of studies was conducted in different databases. A total of 332 studies were reviewed, of which 11 studies were included. The New Castle-Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist were used to assess quantitative and qualitative studies, respectively. Meta-analysis was carried out via Stata version 17. Forest plots, heterogeneity tests, and funnel plots were performed. The total prevalence of infertility was 25.77%. The subgroup prevalence of primary infertility was 22.76%, and that of secondary infertility was 12.67%. Spiritual activity, medical treatment, cultural practice, seeking support from family, adoption, acceptance, having a godchild, estranged social life, helplessness, extramarital engagement, and marital separation were the identified coping mechanisms among infertile couples. There is limited evidence of infertility in Ethiopia. Its magnitude in Ethiopia is high compared to standards. Most of the reported strategies were problem-focused coping mechanisms. The lives of infertile women are burdened with deep emotional and social effects. The health delivery system and health service providers need to look at the psychosocial aspects of advanced infertility treatment options and effective counselling.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,013
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,030
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,756
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0130,030
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0260,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,263
Tête enseignante GPT0,492
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle