Association Between Di‐(2‐Ethylhexyl) Phthalate and Childhood Asthma Through Plasma Metabolome Alterations
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Exposure to environmental factors has been linked to increased asthma risk. However, few studies have investigated the complex relationships among exposome, metabolites, and asthma. Existing research suggests that environmental exposures shape omics profiles associated with respiratory outcomes. A recent study of preschool children found that metabolomic clusters associated with asthma risk varied by neighborhood resources, suggesting that environmental triggers may induce both metabolic and disease severity [1]. The Human Early Life Exposome project linked prenatal and childhood exposures to serum metabolomic shifts potentially predisposing children to asthma [2]. Despite this progress, the interplay among exposome, metabolites, and disease pathogenesis remains insufficiently explored, particularly in childhood asthma. This study aimed to elucidate the integrated relationships among urinary exposome, plasma metabolites, and childhood asthma. We analyzed 139 children aged 6–7 years from the general population-based ECHO-COCOA (Exposome and Child Health with Omics–Cohort for Childhood Origin of Asthma and allergic diseases) birth cohort study, 26 children with asthma and 113 children without asthma and atopic dermatitis (Table S1). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Mass spectrometry–based methods were used to quantify 74 urinary exposome components (Table S2) and plasma metabolites (Table S3). Global metabolomic profiling identified asthma-related metabolites, followed by targeted quantification of selected features, mainly glycerophospholipids, amino acids, and derivatives. These target metabolome data were analyzed in relation to urinary exposures and asthma-related outcomes. Asthma-associated urinary exposures were initially identified (Figure 1). Then, metabolites related to these asthma-associated exposures were explored. Asthma-associated exposures included arsenic, phenylmercuric acetate, and mono-n-butyl phthalate, which were linked to increased acetylornithine. Phosphatidylcholine (PC) (12:0/12:0), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) (16:0/16:0), taurine, and spermidine were significantly associated with diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) metabolites (mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP), mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP), mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP)) (Figure 2A). Notably, PE (16:0/16:0), taurine, and spermidine also correlated with asthma-related clinical markers. Taurine showed a negative correlation with PC20 and a positive association with eosinophil count. PE (16:0/16:0) and spermidine positively correlated with eosinophils, while PE (16:0/16:0) also associated with total IgE levels. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis revealed possible causal relationships between taurine and PC20; PE (16:0/16:0) and IgE; and taurine, spermidine, PE (16:0/16:0) and eosinophils (Table S4). These metabolites are also associated with IL-1β, a central pro-inflammatory cytokine in asthma. These findings suggest that taurine, spermidine, and PE (16:0/16:0) could be promising candidate biomarkers of asthma in the context of DEHP exposure. Taurine, spermidine, and PEs are recognized regulators of autophagy and antioxidants, mitigating oxidative stress and inflammation in asthma [3-5]. Elevated levels of these metabolites might reflect a compensatory response or indicate regulatory mechanisms of autophagy. Additionally, arachidonic acid metabolism—implicated in asthma inflammation—has been linked to taurine efflux, which may explain the increased taurine levels in asthmatics [6]. Elevated spermidine and PEs have also been observed in adult asthma. However, mechanisms underlying DEHP's effects on these metabolites remain unclear. Nonetheless, these metabolites may serve as potential biomarkers for DEHP-associated childhood asthma (Figure 2B,C). Although DEHP has a short half-life (~1 day), its widespread presence in consumer products results in chronic, low-level pseudo-persistence in the body. Although the low prevalence of childhood asthma in the general population of Korea may limit statistical power, our results are strengthened by MR analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. These methods helped us minimize the influence of confounding factors and distinguish metabolite biomarkers between asthmatic and non-asthmatic children. Further research, especially longitudinal and extended cohort and mechanistic validations, is needed to validate our result. Multiple urinary sampling or 24-h urine collection could improve the assessment of long-term exposures. Overall, our findings highlight taurine, spermidine, and PE (16:0/16:0) as potential biomarkers of phthalate-related childhood asthma. Methodology: M. J. Kim, S. J. Kim, H. E. Song, and H. Lee, Resources: S. H. Lee, M. J. Kang, S.-I. Yang, H.-B. Kim, S. Y. Lee, J.-H. Kim, H. Im, H. J. Seong, Y. J. Park, J. Yeom, E. J. Choi, D. I. Suh, K. W. Kim, K. Ahn, Y. H. Shin, and S.-J. Hong, Data analysis and interpretation of data: J.-H. Oh, S. Hong and H. J. Yoo, Writing, review and editing: M. J. Kim, S. H. Lee, S.-J. Hong, and H. J. Yoo. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. Table S1: Clinical characteristics of study subjects. p-values were calculated using Chi-squared test or Mann–Whitney test. Table S2: 74 environmental substances were measured in the urine of the study subjects. Table S3: List of target metabolites measured in the plasma of the study subjects. Table S4: One sample bi-directional Mendelian randomization. p-value and bonf.p-value represents the raw.p-value and Bonferroni.p-value, respectively. N.snps: the number of SNPs used in constructing genetic risk scores. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».