Adolescent experiences and exposures: a systematic review of life course outcomes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Adolescence (ages 10-19) is a critical developmental stage that influences outcomes in adulthood and old age. There is growing policy interest in adolescent interventions that are efficiently targeted, demonstrate long-term returns, and impact various domains of well-being. More data is needed to identify which adolescent experiences and exposures can serve as effective levers to shift developmental trajectories and achieve long-term benefits. Methods: This review examines evidence on the predictive outcomes of adolescent experiences and exposures across the life course. The review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023407980). Peer reviewed articles published from March 2010 to July 2025 were included. A framework was adapted to track associations across six core domains of well-being-Agency and Resilience, Connectedness, Family Dynamics, Health and Nutrition, Learning Competence, and Safety-from adolescence through the life course. A systematic search identified relevant studies, followed by a structured descriptive review using the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) methodology to assess the evidence across domains. Quality was evaluated with an adapted Critical Appraisal Skills Program Checklist. Findings: Of the 244 included papers, 2231 analyses tested associations between adolescent exposures and life course outcomes, covering data from over 2.1 million adolescents. The Health and Nutrition domain was the most studied domain accounting for 60% of all tested associations, of which 42% were statistically significant. In addition to predicting health outcomes, health in adolescence predicts violence exposure, education, and employment in later life. Safety and Supportive Environments, and Agency and Resilience, though less studied, were also robust predictors of a range of adult outcomes with 35% and 48% of tested associations being statistically significant, respectively. Learning Competence and Safety in adolescence strongly predicts economic success and stability in adulthood. No studies reported on intergenerational effects of exposures during adolescence. Interpretation: This review uses a systematic approach to demonstrate that adolescent experiences predict adulthood outcomes beyond the original domain of exposure, with significant cross-domain associations. However, it finds that the evidence is unevenly distributed across domains of well-being. In addition, the results shed light on gaps in research on lower-income settings and across demographic variables including sex and socio-economic status. Funding: This work was supported by Velux Stiftung, Zurich.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».