Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Home-Based Occupational Therapy with Activity Monitoring for Daily Functioning of People Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Partially Randomised Usual Care Stepped-Wedge Trial (Preprint)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND Transitioning from a geriatric rehabilitation centre or hospital to home is challenging for persons post-stroke, as they must increase their ability to perform daily activities and self-manage their lives. Moreover, persons post-stroke exhibit more sedentary behaviour at home than during rehabilitation, which is detrimental to their health. The Occupational Therapy at Home E-Rehabilitation (OTHER) intervention aims to increase daily activities and self-management in persons post-stroke. OTHER involves in-person (online) coaching with information from activity monitoring. OBJECTIVE Here, we describe the design of a study investigating the (cost-)effectiveness of OTHER on the recovery of daily activities among older persons after stroke and evaluate its implementation process. METHODS A partially cluster randomised stepped-wedge trial is conducted in nine geriatric rehabilitation centres and two hospitals, aiming to include 171 post-stroke participants (aged ≥ 60 years) who are starting (inpatient) rehabilitation to return home. The intervention group receives the OTHER intervention by an occupational therapist, starting at the institute and continuing at home. This intervention consists of activity monitoring to increase insight into movement behaviour, as well as coaching by occupational therapists on improving daily activities at home. This supports persons post-stroke in performing daily activities and increasing self-management. The control group receives care as usual. The primary outcome is the performance score of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, which measures a person's perceived daily functioning at 6 months. A process evaluation will be conducted to assess the implementation process of the OTHER intervention during the research period. RESULTS Recruitment started on April 23, 2023. We completed recruitment for people after stroke at the end of July 2025. Data collection will continue until the end of January 2026. At the time of submission (November 2025), 121 participants had been enrolled. For the process evaluation, professionals for the focus groups (November 2025) are recruited now and individual interview of people post-stroke and informal caregiver started in February 2025 and will go on until December 2025. CONCLUSIONS This trial is studying the effect of activity monitoring combined with home-based occupational therapy coaching for persons post-stroke. With this study, we aim to provide insight into the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the OTHER intervention compared to care as usual for persons post-stroke, and describe the process of implementation, which includes home-based geriatric rehabilitation. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05855226; https://clinicaltrial.be/nl/details/267616?country=Netherlands&only_eligible=0&only_recruiting=1&per_page=100 Preprint at MEDRXIV: 2025/337833
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,011 | 0,008 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,047 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».