Recurrence of Ulnar Vascular Malformations Involving Ulnar Nerve Compression, a Case Series
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Vascular malformations (VMs) of the ulnar artery are rare, with an unclear prevalence [1]. Most upper limb VMs can be managed conservatively [2], but treatment may be necessary when they lead to aneurysm, rupture, thrombosis, or nerve compression [1]. A prior review of the literature reported nine case reports of ulnar artery VMs, two of which involved ulnar nerve compression, with no recurrence after treatment [3]. However, our clinical experience suggests that recurrences are not uncommon. We present three cases of VM recurrence after treatment, each involving ulnar nerve compression. A 39-year-old woman was first seen at age 25 years for a painful swelling with a blue discoloration over the right dorsal and medial elbow region. Her medical history included prior surgery for olecranon bursitis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and duplex ultrasound (US) confirmed a VM near the ulnar nerve at the elbow. A year later, complete VM obliteration was achieved with sclerotherapy treatment using aethoxysklerol foam. This provided only partial symptom relief for a few years. At 29 years, she sought care again due to elbow pain, limited elbow flexion and extension, increasing swelling of the arm and hand, and handgrip weakness. Alcohol embolization of the entire VM was performed, but it resulted in sensory loss and muscle weakness in an ulnar distribution. Initially there was partial recovery of ulnar nerve function over several months, but symptoms worsened after 1 year, including progressive hand intrinsic muscle atrophy. An electrodiagnostic (EDx) study confirmed ulnar neuropathy localized to the site of previous VM, and US showed VM recurrence (Figure 1A). Surgical partial resection of the recurrent malformation with neurolysis was performed. Postoperatively, motor and sensory function improved. A year later, EDx studies showed reinnervation, with normalization of the ulnar nerve cross-sectional area on US (Figure 1B). There was no recurrence over a 9-year follow-up. This 21-year-old woman had been diagnosed with a VM of the medial left forearm since birth, for which she underwent surgery and repeated embolization at the age of 8 years, and had worn a compression stocking since. Genetic VM tissue testing showed a de novo phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutation. PIK3CA-related overgrowth syndrome spectrum is commonly associated with venous anomalies and results from mosaic somatic mutations [4]. At the age of 14 years forearm pain and functional impairment increased, and MRI showed an expansion of the VM surrounding the ulnar artery, with an intramuscular extension into the finger extensors. Embolizations at ages 17 and 19 years provided only temporary pain relief. An EDx study confirmed ulnar neuropathy, and US showed ulnar nerve thickening throughout the forearm (Figure 2A,B). The patient then underwent surgical release of the ulnar nerve; intraoperative visualization confirmed the VM had grown into the ulnar nerve (Figure 2C). Postoperatively, the patient developed thrombophlebitis which was successfully treated with anticoagulation. Pain dissipated, but recurred within a few months, radiating from the wrist to the forearm and fingers. Physical examination revealed weakness, allodynia and sensory loss in an ulnar distribution. Pulsed radiofrequency therapy alleviated pain initially but it recurred within months. The patient has declined additional neuromodulation treatment and was considering forearm amputation at the last follow-up. Patient 3, previously described in the literature [3], underwent surgical resection of an ulnar artery VM, which recurred after 6 months. A second surgical resection was performed, but the VM recurred again after 2 months. Our findings highlight the recurrence of VMs of the ulnar artery. Recurrence times in our patients ranged from 2 months to 6 years, with the interval shortening after each recurrence. Awareness of recurrence is crucial for patient counseling and this underscores the need to inform patients that VM recurrence is possible, regardless of the type of treatment (endovascular or surgical resection), and may occur months or years later. In cerebral VM's recurrence after angiographically confirmed complete surgical resection is 9.5% (range 2.8%–16%), occurring from several months to 16 years after initial resection in children, and much rarer in adults, with only 18 cases reported in the English literature in the last 30 years [5]. Future studies should establish the recurrence rate in peripheral VM's, which may differ from cerebral AVM's due to differences in etiology, symptoms and treatment, to assist with patient counseling. Clinicians must differentiate between pain caused by local pressure from the VM recurrence and pain due to ulnar nerve compression, as the treatments differ. Ultrasound can be a useful tool in this differentiation, as demonstrated in our cases. Galia V. Anguelova: conceptualization (equal), investigation (lead), writing – original draft (lead), review and editing (equal). Jordan VanderEnde: conceptualization (equal), review and editing (equal). Claire I. A. van Houdt: review and editing (equal). Nens van Alfen: conceptualization (equal), review and editing (equal). We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines. Nens van Alfen is an ultrasound instructor for Sonoskills and performs editorial services for Wiley Publishing; all payment goes to their employer. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».