MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4415928440 · doi:10.1007/s40744-025-00802-5

Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Treating Oligoarticular and Polyarticular Psoriatic Arthritis: Primary Analysis from the UPJOINT-Study

2025· article· en· W4415928440 sur OpenAlexaff
S. G. Werner, Ilka Schwarze, Xenofon Baraliakos, Michael Fiene, Jochen Walter, Tanya Girard, Marie-Claude Laliberté, Katharina Jeromin, Nikola Baschuk, Hugues Allard-Charmard, Louis Bessette, Axel J. Hueber

Notice bibliographique

RevueRheumatology and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversité de SherbrookeABB (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesAbbVie
Mots-clésClinical trialMEDLINEPsoriatic arthritisDiseaseRheumatoid arthritis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in patients with either oligo- or polyarticular active psoriatic arthritis (oPsA/pPsA) in routine clinical practice. UPJOINT is a post-marketing, multicenter observational study in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), treated with upadacitinib according to local label over a period of 48 weeks. The decision for treatment initiation with upadacitinib was independent of the study participation. The study’s denominated primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving minimal disease activity (MDA) at week 24 under continuous treatment with upadacitinib. Furthermore, maintenance of MDA response at week 48 among those who achieved response at week 24 was evaluated. Also, very low disease activity (VLDA), and improvement of the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) in oPsA/pPsA were further composite outcomes of interest evaluated at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 after treatment initiation. Safety data were collected in a separate dataset using standardized operating procedures regarding the documentation of adverse events, followed by MedDRA hierarchy categorization using system organ classes. A total of 364 patients were included in the effectiveness dataset for an as-observed analysis. The proportion of patients achieving MDA increased from 3.6% (overall) at baseline, 7.1% (oPsA), and 1.3% (pPsA) to 41.5% (overall), 55.8% (oPsA), and 32.0% (pPsA) at week 24, respectively. At week 48, 47.5% of the patients with oPsA and 35.1% of the patients with pPsA achieved MDA. The proportion of MDA responders increased noticeably as early as week 4 in both subgroups (oPsA 38.4%, pPsA 16.3%). The proportion of patients achieving VLDA and DAPSA remission increased from 0% for both outcomes at baseline in patients with oPsA and pPsA to 22.2% and 14.3% and 24.2% and 14.9%, respectively, at week 48. Altogether 127 (33.3%) patients experienced 213 adverse events (AEs) with a reasonable possibility of being related to the study drug. Forty-one serious AEs were reported in 26 patients (6.8%). From the categorized AEs of particular interest, infections were most common. However, in line with previous clinical studies, no new safety signals were identified. Our data confirm that the effectiveness of upadacitinib in routine clinical practice is consistent with previous phase 3 trials for the treatment of active PsA, independent of the disease phenotype. Fast treatment effects reflected MDA achievement after 4 weeks of treatment in both PsA subgroups, similar to what is known from clinical studies. NCT04758117 (ClinicalTrials.gov). Upadacitinib is an antirheumatic medical therapy approved for treating psoriatic arthritis in patients with insufficient response to previous conventional or biological treatments. Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the joints, spine, tendons/entheses, skin, nails, and other parts of the musculoskeletal system. To prevent potentially irreversible damage to joints, spine, and entheses and reduce disease-related impairment of quality of life, early diagnosis and rapid initiation of anti-inflammatory therapy are essential for patients with psoriatic arthritis. The results presented in this manuscript help clinicians evaluate whether the treatment effectiveness of upadacitinib is different in two psoriatic arthritis subtypes common in daily clinical practice, i.e., oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis (affecting ≤ 4 joints in a somewhat asymmetric pattern including large joints) and polyarticular psoriatic arthritis (affecting ≥ 5 joints in a symmetric or asymmetric pattern). The results presented in this manuscript investigate the effectiveness of upadacitinib regarding these subtypes in a routine clinical practice setting, measured by clinically relevant treatment outcomes over 48 weeks. Overall, our findings confirm previous results in the literature highlighting the efficacious treatment effect of upadacitinib, resulting in a considerable reduction of disease-related symptoms and a substantial increase in the number of patients with oligo- or polyarticular psoriatic arthritis achieving minimal or very low disease activity and remission until week 24 and up to 48 weeks of treatment with rapid positive treatment effects detected in some patients as early as week 4.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,065
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,388

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRheumatology and TherapyMême sujetSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207