Studying The Health Implications of Metro Rail Or Highway Construction on Local Communities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper examines the frequently neglected public health consequences of constructing metro rail and highways on adjacent villages, considering Indian law. As India's cities grow quickly and its economy grows, infrastructure development is speeding up. This is bad for the health of people living near construction sites. Air pollution, noise pollution, contaminated water, and the stress of having to move your whole life are all possible risks. For instance, the Center for Science and Environment (2019) says that since PM2.5, there have been more instances of asthma and bronchitis in the affected communities. Five levels at construction sites for the Delhi Metro were three to five times higher than what the World Health Organization says is safe. But the current rules in India don't do enough to deal with the health problems that come with these kinds of big city projects, even though they do have these effects. The analysis includes a thorough look at Indian laws, pertinent case law, and environmental rules. It also compares the legal systems of other countries, such as the US, the EU, Australia, and Canada. These countries use health impact assessments (HIAs), public involvement methods, and strict monitoring systems to plan infrastructure. The results show that the Indian court system generally puts economic or environmental issues ahead of health concerns, rather than community health. Health impact assessments are not actually a part of the process of managing infrastructure. There have been no systemic legal protections or enforceable health standards put in place for infrastructure projects, even though the courts play a big role in establishing the right to health under Article 21. This study highlights the importance of health impact assessments (HIAs), public involvement, and post-approval monitoring in ensuring proper accountability for health outcomes. This article highlights the imperative necessity for reform by juxtaposing India's policies and regulations with those of other developed countries. It calls for health impact assessments to be a required part of environmental impact assessments (EIAs), more community participation, and health audits after projects. Health departments, urban planners, and legal bodies should work together, it says, to institutionalize development that is more holistic and preventative. Rather than relying on reactive legal frameworks, the report argues for proactive frameworks that address health concerns at every stage of infrastructure development. Public health must be recognized as an essential ethical and legal issue if India's urban development is to be inclusive, sustainable, and socially equal. Detailed legal and policy recommendations are offered in the paper to align the administration of India's infrastructure with the country's constitutional guarantee of the right to health.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».