The 5 R’s of Indigenous Research as a Framework to Co-Design and Evaluate an Outdoor Play Program in Early Learning and Child Care Centers: Protocol for the Promoting Early Childhood Outside (PRO-ECO) 2.0 Wait-List Control Cluster Randomized Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Outdoor play is a fundamental part of childhood. Children's participation in outdoor play connects them to nature and the land, and supports their role in the natural world. Early learning and child care (ELCC) centers provide opportunities for outdoor play; however, barriers toward the provision of outdoor play exist, including educator attitudes, policies and procedures, outdoor space limitations, and adverse weather conditions. OBJECTIVE: The Promoting Early Childhood Outside (PRO-ECO) 2.0 study is a community-based research partnership with Indigenous Knowledge Keepers and Elders, Indigenous and early childhood organizations, early childhood education faculty, ELCC centers, and families, aiming to expand outdoor play in ELCC centers. This paper provides an overview of the community-based design process, guided by the 5 R's-Respect, Relevance, Responsibility, Reciprocity, and Relationship-and the resulting study protocol for the mixed methods waitlist control cluster randomized trial. METHODS: This study considered a 5 R's research approach from its inception, beginning with the formation of a Steering Committee and over a year of relationship building before formal study activities commenced. A key early focus was collaboratively identifying project values through an iterative process. Collectively, we worked to promote equity, disrupt power dynamics, and embed Indigenous data sovereignty principles into research agreements, marking a significant departure from traditional Western research processes. The PRO-ECO program and study protocol are implemented in partnership with 10 ELCC centers delivering licensed full-day, year-round care to children aged 2.5-6 years in rural and urban areas of British Columbia, Canada. The PRO-ECO program includes 4 components to address common barriers to outdoor play in ELCC settings. Primary outcome measures include the proportion and diversity of observed nature play behavior during dedicated outdoor times at ELCC centers as measured through observational behavior mapping. Secondary outcomes include changes in educator attitudes, quality of ELCC outdoor play space, and children's perspectives of their experiences at ELCC centers. Outcome data are collected at baseline, and 6 months and 12 months post baseline. The community's perspectives (educators, children, and families) on the project are assessed qualitatively to understand the acceptability of the PRO-ECO program. Mixed-effect models will test the effect of the PRO-ECO program on quantitative outcomes. Qualitative data will support the interpretation of quantitative findings and provide evidence on project acceptability. RESULTS: Participant recruitment for this study began in August 2023, and data collection was completed in March 2025. A total of 229 children, 91 staff and early childhood educators, and 40 family members were recruited to participate in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The PRO-ECO 2.0 study uses a rigorous experimental design within a community-based research project. The 5 R's approach grounded our work in shared values, disrupting traditional academic power relations and weaving together Indigenous and Western worldviews in the context of academic research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05626595; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05626595. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/77956.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,111 | 0,100 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,047 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».