Evaluation of a Digital, Self-Administered, Cognitive Test Battery in Older Adult Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: Nonrandomized Feasibility Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Older adults undergoing surgeries face increased risks of postoperative neurocognitive disorders, which impair cognitive functions. Analog neurocognitive tests are commonly used, but digital tests offer faster, more accessible assessments. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a digital cognitive test battery in older adults undergoing abdominal surgery. Feasibility included estimation of recruitment and retention rates, acceptability, perceived value, and usability of the test. The secondary aim was to explore outcome trajectories of cognition, depression, functional status, and quality of recovery. Methods: This nonrandomized feasibility study measured recruitment and retention rates using patient logs and expanded on these findings in semistructured interviews with nurses. Acceptability, perceived value, and usability were explored through interviews with patients and nurses, and the System Usability Scale (SUS). Cognitive functions were assessed with a digital cognitive test battery (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer Disease [CERAD] word list learning test, Trail Making Test Parts A and B, Victoria Stroop Test, and Symbol Digit Pairing Test) and the Nursing Delirium Screening scale (NU-DESC), and depression with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15). Functional status was measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), and postoperative recovery with the Swedish Quality of Recovery questionnaire (SwQoR-24). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests and qualitative data with content analysis. Results: The test battery was feasible, acceptable, and demonstrated excellent usability. The mean SUS score was 87 (SD 17.9; 95% CI 78.9-95.2), and all predefined progression criteria were met. Recruitment spanned over 1.5 years, during which 24 patients were included (mean age of 77, SD 6.5 years; range: 63-90 years; n=13, 54% women). Most patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Three patients developed postoperative delirium for 1 day only. No patient developed delayed neurocognitive recovery or mild/major neurocognitive disorder at the postoperative follow-up. Qualitative data showed that both nurses and patients regarded the digital cognitive test battery as important for assessing cognitive function and found it easy to use and understand. Nurses reported that recruitment was challenging, partly because not all patients attended a preoperative in-person consultation before surgery. Conclusions: The digital, self-administered cognitive test battery was found to be feasible, acceptable, and usable in older adults undergoing abdominal surgery. However, recruitment challenges and a small, homogeneous sample limit generalizability and warrant careful consideration in a larger-scale study.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,017 | 0,023 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».