The impact of a personalized oral health instruction form on oral health indices in institutionalized older adults: a randomized, controlled, single-blinded clinical trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: This RCT aimed to test the impact of an educational intervention, supported by a Personalized Oral Health Instruction Form (POIF), on oral health indices in institutionalized older adults. METHODS: Older adults aged 65 years and above living in a long-term care facility were recruited. Baseline oral health indices were recorded for all participants. Caregivers received training on oral health care in small groups. Custom-made software was used to create a POIF for each participant, which was then implemented alongside verbal instructions and the provision of an oral hygiene kit in the intervention group, whereas in the control group, the participants received verbal instructions and an oral hygiene kit only. After three weeks, a second examination was conducted by the same examiner, who was blinded to participants' group allocation. Plaque index (PI), denture cleanliness (DCI), and tongue coating (TCI) were recorded at baseline and after intervention. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), assessed at baseline and after intervention using the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI). Wilcoxon signed rank tests were conducted with the level of significance set at P<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients (mean age: 85.5 ± 7.7 years) were included. Plaque index (PI) significantly decreased in both groups from baseline to postintervention (p < 0.001), with a significantly lower median score in the intervention group (31.6%, IQR=51.1) than in the control group (53.9%, IQR=51.1; P = 0.023). DCI improved significantly within the intervention group (Wilcoxon P = 0.046), with a greater proportion of patients showing no visible plaque after the intervention than at baseline (66.7% vs. 33.3%). TCI did not change significantly over time in either group (n.s.). A combined hygiene outcome based on the PI and DCI showed significantly better plaque control in the intervention group (P =0.006). GOHAI total score increased from 50 (IQR=9) to 54 (IQR= 4). This improvement was statistically significant within the intervention group (P = 0.006), whereas it was not significant between groups at the final assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirm that POIFs using tailored, visually supported, printed oral health guidance improve oral health outcomes in institutionalized older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the ethics committee of the canton of Geneva (CCER 2022--00086) and registered on the Swiss national registry for clinical trials (SNCTP000004829) and was retrospectively registered on clinical trials with the registration number NCT07063927 on 2025-07-02.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».