Exploring parental perspectives of physiotherapy in children with congenital heart disease: a qualitative study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Children with congenital heart disease demonstrate developmental and functional impairment throughout their life. Published literature is limited but suggests postsurgical physiotherapy positively impacts developmental and functional outcomes in these children. We aimed to understand parental opinions of their child's development or function, their experiences of physiotherapy services, how they feel physiotherapy could be used to support their child and what impacted access to services. METHODS: A qualitative study using semistructured online interviews was conducted among parents of children with a diagnosis of congenital heart disease under the age of 16 years, who had undergone cardiac surgery in the UK. Data were collected between July and December 2024. The data were explored using reflexive thematic analysis and the study was reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. RESULTS: 12 semistructured interviews were completed involving 12 mothers and 1 father. Themes identified were parental priorities; understanding and experience of physiotherapy; access to physiotherapy and ideal physiotherapy service. Parental expectations of their child's development were influenced by antenatal care and postnatal experiences. Parents continually evaluate the need for their child to access developmental and functional support. Engagement with physiotherapy is influenced by parental understanding, quality of service provision, impact of interventions on their child and the practical and emotional consequences to their family. Parents want physiotherapy services to deliver parental education and individualised support throughout their child's life, particularly around key life events. CONCLUSIONS: Parental engagement with physiotherapy services is influenced by parental expectations of their child's development and function, and their understanding of the potential benefits of physiotherapy. Physiotherapists should prioritise promoting and increasing awareness of physiotherapists' role in children with congenital heart disease, alongside parental education and individualised care, to facilitate engagement.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».