ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AND HOP PERFORMANCE IN ADOLESCENTS WITH AN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT-DEFICIENT KNEE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Physical readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and associated treatments and surgery is often assessed using a battery of tests, including hop test performance. However, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) also serve an important role as they are linked to psychological readiness for returning to sports and can predict clinical and return to sport outcomes. However, the PROMs commonly used as part of criteria for return to sport in adolescents and pediatric patients still requires further investigation. The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between PROMs and hop performance in male and female ACL Deficient (ACLD) pediatric patients. Patients from a pediatric orthopaedic sports medicine practice found to have a complete ACL tear were prospectively enrolled in a larger cohort including objective testing pre-operatively. We assessed symptoms, activities, and total score of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) as indicators of knee function, and the total score of the Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (PEDI-FABS) as an indicator of physical activity level. The maximal distances achieved in single, lateral, crossover, and triple hop tests normalized to leg length and the lower time in timed 6-meter with the injured leg were analyzed. Linear regression was used to determine the association between PROMs and hop test performance for females and males separately using SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp, USA), with α set at 0.05. The global effect size (ƒ²) was also calculated, with the following interpretation: small (≥0.02), medium (≥0.15), and large (≥0.35). Sixty-five ACLD females [age:15.2(1.5) years, height:1.65(0.06) m, weight:64.6(11.7) kg] and 28 ACLD males [age:15.6(1.4) years, height:1.74(0.09) m, weight:72.4(16.9) kg] completed PROMs and underwent a battery of hop tests. Among ACLD females, a medium association was observed between (1) IKDC total score and the single hop test (Figure-1A), (2) PEDI-FABS score and the lateral hop (Figure-1B); a small association between (3) PEDI-FABS score and crossover (Figure-1C), (4) PEDI-FABS score and triple hop tests (Figure-1D). However, for ACLD males, no associations were found between the PROMs and hop test performance. In adolescent ACLD females, PROMs present small to medium associations with hop performance; however, this was not present in males. We therefore conclude that patient self-perception of their physical activity level and knee function as evaluated through PROMs does not necessarily reflect their functional capacity and hop performance. We also found evidence that male and female ACLD adolescents respond differently to clinical evaluations. Our findings also suggest that commonly used tools in adults may not be directly applicable to pediatric ACLD patients. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».