PATIENT OUTCOMES FOLLOWING REDUCTION AND ASSOCIATION OF THE SCAPHOID AND LUNATE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Scapholunate lunate ligament (SLL) injury is the most common ligamentous injury of the wrist; however, the optimal surgical management remains unclear [1,2]. One promising technique for SLL reconstruction is the Reduction and Association of the Scaphoid and Lunate procedure (RASL), first described by Rosenwasser [3]. Despite promising preliminary outcomes by the creator [4], the outcomes of this procedure remain variable [5]. The objective of this retrospective analysis was to investigate factors affecting patient outcomes following the RASL procedure. Twenty-three patients who had a SLL tear treated with a RASL using a dual-incision approach as described by Rossenwasser [3] completed the data collection process. Participants completed a demographic survey and three standardized patient-reported outcome tools (DASH, PRWE and PROMIS questionnaires). Standard wrist radiographs were taken, and bilateral wrist range-of-motion and grip strength were measured. The scapholunate interval, scapholunate angle, radioscaphoid angle, radiolunate angle were measured preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at long-term follow up. The intraoperative images were used to assess screw placement. All measurements were taken by the primary author and independently verified by two board-certified hand surgeons. The average time since surgery was 6.3 years, with a minimum time since surgery of 2.2 years and a maximum of 11.1 years. The average age was 36.2 (SD 11) years at the time of injury. At the time of final follow-up, the average DASH score was 11.2 (SD 13). There was no correlation between DASH score and preoperative scapholunate angle (R² = 0.056), screw angle (R² = 0.061), or time from surgery (R² = 0.014). The average screw angle measured our intraoperative radiographs was 15.2° (SD 6.3°). At time of final follow-up, 4 participants had undergone a second surgery for screw removal and 1 participant was converted to a four-corner fusion for persistent pain. The average preoperative scapholunate gap was 5.0 mm in the group who had a second surgery (n =5) compared to 3.0 mm in the group with no revision surgery (n =18). The average screw angle measured our intraoperative radiographs falls below the target angle of 23°; however, we did not find a correlation between screw angle and patient-reported outcomes. Possible factors contributing to patient outcomes include severity of the injury as measured by pre-operative scapholunate gap. We conclude that patients can have exceptional outcomes following the RASL, but larger scale studies are required to identify patient and injury-related factors to select good candidates.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».