DEVELOPMENT OF A SURGICAL DIFFICULTY SCORE FOR OPEN REDUCTION INTERNAL FIXATION OF PILON FRACTURES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Definitive surgical management of pilon fractures varies from relatively straightforward to extremely challenging. Objective assessment and prediction of surgical difficulty would be useful to guide orthopedic surgeons with management or referral, help accurately schedule and bill for the required operative time, and track surgeon and institutional performance. Integrating machine learning (ML) into these predictions will allow for robust models and broaden their applicability. The purpose of this research is to 1) identify specific injury characteristics that contribute to surgical complexity in pilon fracture management, and 2) develop a ML Pilon Surgical Difficulty Score (PSDS) based on these factors. A retrospective cohort study of 100 pilon fractures managed definitively with operative fixation was conducted at an academic Level 1 Trauma Center. The following patient and injury characteristics were assessed: age, body mass index (BMI), osteoporosis, open fracture type, AO/OTA code, articular comminution, presence and location of articular impaction, articular displacement, metaphyseal comminution, diaphyseal extension, fibula fracture, syndesmosis injury, and delayed delay to surgery (days). Surgical difficulty for each case was measured using two outcomes: 1) perceived difficulty and 2) operative time. Perceived difficulty was determined by taking the average of 12 fellowship trained traumatologist grading on the perceived case difficulty from an ordinal scale from one to ten. Univariate analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of difficulty for each outcome. ML models including linear regression, random forest, and neural network were used to develop various PSDSs using recursive feature elimination and evaluated for predictive accuracy by five-fold cross-validation. The cohort included 8 43A, 31 43B, and 61 43C type fractures. The mean perceived difficulty was 5.06 (range: 1.50-9.25) and mean operative time was 4.98 (range: 1.45-11.07 hours). Significant predictors of perceived difficulty included AO/OTA classification (p=0.01) and delay to surgery (p There is a large range in the surgical difficulty and operative time required to perform definitive fixation for pilon fractures. A large proportion of the variance is predictable based on the severity of the fracture pattern and delay to definitive fixation. This project used machine learning to generate accurate PSDSs for both difficulty and operative time. Future work should aim to clinically validate these PSDSs so they may be used to accurately schedule patients, improve institutional performance and improve patient outcomes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».