A PREOPERATIVE COMPARISON OF SENSOR-BASED FREE-LIVING AND IN-CLINIC VIDEO-BASED GAIT MEASURES IN PATIENTS AWAITING KNEE ARTHROPLASTY SURGERY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Gait metrics have been used to predict knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression and classify OA severity, but require the use of sophisticated laboratory-based equipment1,2. Wearable sensors offer a solution to monitor free-living gait over extended periods of time, yet the relationship between sensor-based and video-based gait measures is not well understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the association of daily walking metrics captured by an accelerometer and knee kinematic gait outcomes measured using video-based motion capture in a population of people awaiting knee arthroplasty surgery. Patients with end-stage knee OA were recruited from participating surgeons’ knee arthroplasty waitlists. Gait outcomes were measured using an in-clinic video-based, markerless motion-capture system (Sony, Theia Markerless). Data from ten gait cycles for each participant were processed to calculate knee flexion and adduction angles, knee angular velocities, and gait speed (Visual3D, C-Motion). Free-living gait was measured using a single accelerometer, secured on the shank of the affected limb of each participant (Axivity). Acceleration data reflecting a continuous one-minute walking bout occurring in the middle of the free-living period were extracted for each participant for analysis. Raw acceleration peaks were used to identify foot contact to segment participant steps3. Processed acceleration data were used to align the axes of the sensor to the anatomical axes of the limb segment, and to compute linear shank velocities in the frontal plane and the thrust accelerations (associated with knee adduction moments) during early stance4,5,6. The mean video-based outcomes during stance phase for all participants were compared to the mean sensor-obtained measurements of peak stance acceleration and velocity, range in acceleration and velocity from initial contact to the peak during stance, and thrust acceleration using Pearson's correlation coefficients (r). Video-based and free-living sensor gait data were collected and compared from 21 knee arthroplasty patients awaiting surgery (13M/8F) with an average age and BMI of 69 years (±6) and 33 kg/m^2 (±8) (Table 1). A higher peak knee flexion angle during stance phase (video) was moderately correlated with a higher frontal plane acceleration range from initial contact to peak stance (sensor), a higher frontal plane velocity range from initial contact to peak stance (sensor), and a higher thrust acceleration (sensor). A higher gait speed (video) was moderately correlated with a higher frontal plane acceleration range from initial contact to peak stance (sensor). While the sensor and in-clinic measures were not strongly correlated, the sensor data presented an opportunity to define different, free-living gait outcomes, providing complementary insight into gait mechanics. A better understanding of patient functional variability may be gained, potentially relevant to arthroplasty patient care and decision-making. Gait varies between clinical and real-world settings, meaning the development of clinically relevant metrics to quantify free-living gait mechanics using simple technologies may generate more widespread translational uptake of gait considerations into clinical decision-making. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».