Access to Kidney Transplantation in Adults With Severe Obesity: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: International guidelines do not consider moderate or severe obesity to be a contraindication to kidney transplantation, but clinical practice suggests otherwise. This study evaluated the likelihood of kidney transplantation in patients with moderate or severe obesity and how that likelihood compared with patients with other risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective population-based cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 96,181 adults with kidney failure, living in Canada between 2000 and 2021. EXPOSURE: Moderate or severe obesity and other risk factors (eg, age groups, diabetes, heart disease). OUTCOME: Time to transplantation and time to allograft failure or death. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Parametric survival modeling, adjusting for all risk factors. RESULTS: ) (HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.39-0.47] and HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.71-0.82], respectively). Of 39 characteristics/categories considered, only participants aged ≥80 years were less likely to receive a transplant than those with severe obesity. Transplant recipients were followed for a median of 5.4 years. After those aged ≥65 years, participants with severe obesity were the most likely to experience allograft failure or death (HR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.38-2.02] compared with controls). When we considered combinations of key risk factors, young participants with severe or moderate obesity and few comorbidities were at lower risk for allograft failure or death than participants with other common clinical characteristics. LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian dialysis patients with moderate or severe obesity had a markedly reduced likelihood of receiving a kidney transplant. Although patients with moderate or severe obesity also had a heightened risk of allograft failure or death, the magnitude of the latter was similar to the excess risk associated with other common clinical characteristics. These findings support current practice guidelines and suggest that further work should identify and remove barriers to accessing kidney transplantation among patients with obesity. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: , respectively) to be a contraindication to kidney transplantation, but clinical practice suggests otherwise. Canadian dialysis patients with moderate or severe obesity had a reduced likelihood of receiving a kidney transplant (24% and 57%, respectively). Although patients with moderate or severe obesity also had a heightened risk of allograft failure or death (36% and 70%, respectively), the magnitude of the latter was similar to the excess risk associated with other common clinical characteristics that do not exclude a patient from kidney transplantation. These findings support current practice guidelines and suggest that further work should identify and remove barriers to accessing kidney transplantation among patients with moderate and severe obesity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».