Strengthening equity in gardening initiatives for children and youth: a rapid review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Gardening initiatives may help address modifiable risk factors for cancer and chronic disease among children and youth by fostering more supportive and equitable environments for health. However, the extent to which these initiatives have been intentionally designed to address the social determinants of health and promote health equity remains unclear. The purpose of this review is to identify whether equity-related factors have been considered in gardening initiatives for children and youth, and to explore any reported equity-related effects. METHODS: A rapid review was conducted in March 2024 across multiple electronic databases. Peer-reviewed studies from the past ten years focusing on gardening initiatives in schools, daycares, or community settings within high-income countries were included. Articles underwent dual screening, and one reviewer independently conducted quality appraisal. Equity-related data were extracted using the PROGRESS-Plus framework and synthesized narratively. RESULTS: Studies most frequently incorporated social capital, age/grade level, and socioeconomic status in gardening initiatives. Social capital was commonly associated with improved social connections and relationships among children and their parents, peers, and teachers. It was also linked to the transfer of food-related knowledge and skills to the home environment and contributed to the perceived success and sustainability of initiatives. These outcomes are relevant to reducing modifiable risk factors for cancer and chronic disease. However, barriers such as transportation and time constraints limited parent involvement. Few studies systematically evaluated outcomes or impacts in relation to equity-related factors. CONCLUSIONS: Gardening initiatives that foster social capital - through engagement with parents, peers, and family members, and school-community partnerships - may support positive health-related outcomes for children and youth, including those relevant to cancer and chronic disease prevention. However, to enhance their potential to reduce inequities in health outcomes, these initiatives should be developed, implemented, and evaluated with explicit attention to equity-related factors. Rigorous, equity-focused evaluation is needed to assess the extent and nature of equity-related effects and to strengthen the evidence base for gardening as a strategy to reduce disparities in cancer and chronic disease risk among children and youth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: N/A.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».