Strategic Supply Chain Integration and Competitive Advantage: An Essential Nexus in Vehicle Assembly Firms in Kenya
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This research examined the impact of strategic supply chain integration on the competitive advantage of the vehicle assembly companies in Nairobi City County, Kenya. The Government of Kenya has given attention to the vehicle assembly industry since it forms part of its industrial development strategy, which includes pursued flagship programs such as Vision 2030 and the Big 4 Agenda. Nonetheless, despite these efforts, the Kenya Association of Manufacturers has reported challenges such as severe supply chain inefficiencies and coordination gaps between the assembler, the local suppliers and the modern inventory management systems. The business environment today thrives on rapid technological innovations and charters very robust competitive activity. This scenario has made supply chain integration not only a strategy of excellence, but one of the pillars of organizational success in the long run. In the Kenyan system of industrial development, the flagship initiatives have been emphasized. Nonetheless, even with these measures and efforts, the Kenya Association of Manufacturers notes that it continues to face challenges such as high supply chain inefficiencies, which lead to underutilization of capacity, disjointed coordination among assemblers and local suppliers, and inconsistent uptake of modern inventory management systems. The study focused on the interplay between information sharing, collaborations, lean operations, and inventory control, anchored on the Resource-Based View, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, and Porter Theory of Competitive Advantage. Descriptive research design was adopted, and primary data was collected using questionnaires from 109 stratified supply chain professionals from three large assembly firms (CFAO Mobility Kenya/KVM, Isuzu East Africa). A pilot study was conducted to determine the reliability and validity of the study. Descriptive statistical analysis reported high levels of internal information sharing and strategic collaborations, albeit, their lack of real-time data exchange to suppliers and underuse of automated inventory systems. Multiple regression analysis listed as significant predictors of competitive advantage all four strategic supply chain integration (SSCI) practices, while collaboration was the most substantial as a single predictor. However, the correlation analysis suggested the siloed and isolated nature of the practices, most notably, the gap between strategic information sharing and collaboration integration. Strategic supply chain integration, therefore, is a source of competitive advantage, albeit, remains underexploited and underpinned by the lack of synergistic integration to its components. The study advised companies in the Kenyan automotive industry to enhance the strength and competitiveness of their supply chains by creating consolidated digital supplier portals, developing collaborative operational taskforces, and acquiring automated inventory management systems.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».