MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4416423101 · doi:10.37380/jisib.v15.si1.00

AI-Driven Competitive Intelligence in Decision-Making

2025· article· en· W4416423101 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Intelligence Studies in Business · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueCompetitive and Knowledge Intelligence
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPredictive analyticsBusiness intelligenceAnalyticsCompetitive intelligenceFlexibility (engineering)Big dataWeb intelligenceIntuitionContext (archaeology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This issue brings together the authors’ research, which reveals important and unique themes in the context of understanding competitive environment, which resonate with modern scientific development trends and the dynamics of change. Scientific research offers an in-depth look at current challenges that shape future research directions.Traditional data analysis, which used to be based on human intuition and limited data interpretation, has been transformed today with the introduction of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies. In today’s business environment characterized by rapid change and high uncertainty, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and sound strategies is an essential prerequisite for competitiveness. Predictive analytics is one of the main areas of application of artificial intelligence in data analysis, when organizations face a high level of complexity, determined by dynamic environmental changes and affecting the strategic decisions of organizations.AI-driven competitive intelligence uses advanced algorithms and predictive analytics tools that can identify market trends and competitive strategies. AI-powered predictive models are particularly effective at identifying hidden patterns in complex data sets, providing companies with insights that would be difficult to uncover using traditional methods (Basu, Aktar & Kumar, 2024). Organizations are increasingly incorporating algorithmic and analytical tools into their operations and strategies, using them not only for automation, but also for generating insights and ensuring strategic alignment. Such an approach significantly improves the quality of decision-making, providing organizations with flexibility and the ability to adapt to a dynamic environment in a timely manner (Smyth C. et al., 2024). In turn, the challenge for organizations is to ensure that the information generated by these systems is transformed into organizational knowledge and practical value that has long-term benefits.Another major trend is the rise of social media as a source of knowledge. Once considered secondary, social platforms have become essential for gaining real-time insights into markets, the success of competitors and partners, and consumer opinions. By effectively integrating these unstructured data streams, organizations can significantly improve their situational awareness and resilience in a rapidly changing environment, as they are able to identify both direct and indirect trends, namely, obvious changes in the market and hidden, contextual relationships that affect consumer behavior, competitor strategies, and market dynamics. However, this approach increases the need for data validation, critical analysis, and high-level analytical skills to effectively manage the diversity of digital information and ensure its accurate interpretation. Consequently, organizations simultaneously face a significant challenge, as the growth in the volume and diversity of such data significantly increases the need for careful data validation, critical analysis, and high-level analytical skills.To fully exploit the potential of AI and big data, interdisciplinary skills are required - the ability to combine technological understanding with strategic thinking and critical evaluation of information. Such an approach ensures that the use of data not only improves organizational efficiency, but also promotes sustainable decision-making based on reliable and interpretable data.We would like to express our gratitude to the authors for their analytical perspectives, sharing of research results and contribution to the creation of this publication.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,812
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,361
Écart entre enseignants0,325 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle