MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4416500380 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.14.024

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CANADIAN CARDIOVASCULAR SOCIETY GUIDELINES IN MINIMIZING CARDIAC EVENTS AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

2025· article· en· W4416500380 sur OpenAlexaffabout
R. Al Atassi, James L. Howard, Lyndsay Somerville, Steven J. MacDonald

Notice bibliographique

RevueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Établissements canadiensLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTotal knee arthroplastyArthroplastyJoint arthroplastyTroponinOrthopedic surgeryElective surgeryMortality rate

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The study represents an analysis of the application of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) guidelines for routine postoperative troponin testing after elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce the mortality rate resulting from myocardial injury. The aim of the CCS recommendations is to decrease the mortality rate due to myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery. In general, according to the CCS, all orthopaedic patients who are more than 45 years of age must have daily troponin testing on postoperative days 0 through 3 during hospitalization. Troponin elevation of more than 30 ng/L is termed “myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery” (MINS). Elective TKA surgery is considered a low-intermediate cardiac risk surgery. Because of uncertainty regarding the validity of the CCS guidelines to detect the possible cardiac complications after elective surgery and the current push towards same-day discharge after lower extremity joint arthroplasty surgery we are conducting this study. Our objectives is to determine the prognostic relevance of applying CCS guidelines to patients undergoing elective TKA and to understand the impact of MINS on patient outcomes such as length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, morbidity, and mortality. A total of 715 patients were included in the study who underwent TKA surgery. The surgery was conducted by any of the seven orthopaedic consultants at University Hospital in London, Ontario during the year 2020. Inclusive criteria included all elective TKA patients over the age of 45 years, while emergency, revision, and bilateral TKA surgeries were excluded. The patients were categorized into four groups based on the CCS guidelines. Group A: patients who met the criteria to undergo screening protocol and had it applied; Group B: patients who met the criteria to undergo screening protocol and did not have it applied; Group C: patients who did not meet the criteria for screening protocol but had it applied; and Group D: patients who did not meet the criteria for screening protocol and did not have it applied. We measured different variables including age, gender, LOS in the hospital, ASA classification, type of anesthesia, and BMI. Several risk factors that might increase the risk to develop a cardiac event were evaluated such as history of cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal disease, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, RCRI score and smoking history. The outcomes of interest were any major cardiovascular event, cardiac consultation, and alteration in management. Others like additional cardiac investigation or treatment, and readmission or death within 30 days from surgery were also evaluated. The study cohort included 256 (35.8%) males and 459 (64.1%) females with an average age of 66 years. In patients, who undergo screening protocol, only 30 (4.1 %) patients had a troponin rise of >30 ng/L and developed MINS after their surgery and all of them are in group A. For patients who should have the screening protocol applied according to the CCS guidelines and are represented in group A and B, 11 (1.5%) patients out of them developed cardiac complication. Of the patients who were eligible to receive the protocol but did not receive it (Group B - 286 patients), only 2 patients had a 30-day readmission and without any mortality occurred due to cardiac events. On the other hand, only one patient (0.1%) from group C and D had to be readmitted within 30 days after the surgery and was due to pulseless electrical activity and resulted in death. 30 patients in group A and 3 patients in group C received subsequent subspecialty assessment, and only 16 (2.2%) patients from the entire cohort had a medication change as a result of the assessment. There was a mild increase in LOS in patients who received the MINS screening protocol in group A (255 patients) with a mean of 2.75 days compared to 2.24 day in patients who did not receive the aforementioned protocol who are represented in group B. The implementation of the CCS guidelines for routine postoperative troponin testing in elective TKA surgery did not significantly decrease the rate of cardiac events or mortality. The majority of the patients who developed MINS had no significant change in their management and did not develop any serious cardiac events later. Adherence to the CCS guidelines seemed to be associated with increased hospital stay and unnecessary medical expenses. Therefore, following the CCS guidelines without more specific criteria and additional clinical evidence may be unwarranted and should be re-evaluated to avoid unnecessary costs and resource utilization without providing significant clinical benefits.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,945

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOrthopaedic ProceedingsMême sujetCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesTravaux en français237 207