MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4416619368 · doi:10.1108/dl-11-2017-0007

What Is Problem-Based Learning?

2017· article· en· W4416619368 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueDistance Learning · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueProblem and Project Based Learning
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCurriculumMedical knowledgeHigher educationMedical schoolProfessional developmentDiscipline

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

There are many strategies instructors can use to engage their learners in meaningful learning. One approach, problem-based learning, has its roots in medical education. It was first introduced in the 1950s at Case Western Reserve University. Faculty preparing doctors needed a way to support students’ ability to apply professional skills and knowledge in real-world contexts. Problem-based learning influenced the instructional approaches and curriculum used in medical schools by challenging medical professionals to help their students apply their content knowledge to real medical cases. This methodology, eventually called “problem-based learning,” was officially adopted as a pedagogical approach at Canada’s McMaster University to promote students’ ability to apply their scientific knowledge to clinical situations (Neufeld & Barrows, 1974). The model spread to academic programs for law, business, and education. Currently problem-based learning is used as the predominant approach to learning at various institutions of higher education around the world including the University of Delaware, Maastricht University in the Netherlands, Gadjah Mada University in Indonesia, and the University of Limerick in Ireland.Problem-based learning (often referred to as “PBL”) is also the name for an established instructional model of teaching that challenges students to learn and apply knowledge of content through the application of problem-solving skills to solve meaningful problems in the academic disciplines (Kilbane & Milman, 2013). It consists of the following four phases:This model is intended to be used by educators at all educational levels and settings to build learners’ problem-solving skills while also solving a problem.Another approach with the same abbreviation, “project-based learning” (also referred to as “PBL”), has also become popular in many educational settings. Projectbased learning is a method to promote students’ engagement in the learning process through the structuring of learning around the accomplishment of projects or tasks that have meaning and relevance for the learner. In this type of learning, students have a great deal of say about the projects they will work on and how they will work on them. Although project-based learning shares much in common with problembased learning, they are two distinct models of learning. In both models, instructors motivate students by centering learning on the accomplishment of a meaningful goal. In problem-based learning, that goal is solving a problem. In project-based learning, the goal is completion of a project. Table 1 compares these two learning models.There are many ways in which online educators can use problem-based learning. It can be employed as a major problem that takes a long period of time for students to solve (e.g., over the course of an entire semester), or it can be used during a shorter period of time (e.g., one lecture). Often PBL is incorporated as a case. There are many case-related resources available online. A key feature of problem-based learning is identifying a “good” problem for learners to solve. Problems are chosen or developed by the instructor to correspond with learning goals and objectives. According to Schmidt, Rotgans, and Yew (2011), good problems have certain characteristics, which are:The use of problem-based learning in online settings provides instructors with an approach to designing instruction that provides learners with authentic, real- world learning experiences.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,983
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,000
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,332
Écart entre enseignants0,310 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle