Editorial: Refugees and humanitarian support in the Global South: challenges in repatriation and social cohesion
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Funding constraints further exacerbate these challenges, making it difficult for these countries to manage the influx of refugees effectively. Despite these hurdles, there is potential for social integration to improve living conditions, although peaceful coexistence between host and refugee communities remains a pressing concern. Countries like Bangladesh do not endorse the idea of social integration of the Rohingya refugees, nor do they officially recognise them as refugees; instead, they term them as 'Forcibly Displaced Myanmar Nationals (FDMNs). This illustrates the diverse approaches to refugee management in different regions, which often fail to ensure a dignified life for refugees in camps. Learning from the cases of refugee management from different regions can be a positive approach. This justifies the need for more comprehensive research to address the gaps in understanding the dynamics of refugee management in the Global South.Under such complex circumstances, we aimed to bring together authors to contribute to the literature on these issues, so that scholars in different countries can learn from one another, acknowledging the challenges and difficulties. The topic of the special volume was thus to explore the critical and challenging areas of refugee management from the perspectives of the Global South. Thus, the key themes considered in this special issue are the experiences and challenges faced by these communities in managing the largest forcibly displaced population worldwide. This provided us with the opportunities to identify and address the needs and gaps in refugee management in the Global South, ultimately contributing to more effective and sustainable solutions. The special issue covered the following themes in six articles, including repatriation and its challenges, contemporary challenges such as COVID-19 in refugee communities, border crises, blockchain-based solutions to the refugee crisis, social cohesion and peaceful coexistence, and the need for welfare institutions at the camp level.This volume demonstrates that forced displacement, particularly in the Global South, presents persistent legal, social, and humanitarian challenges that necessitate innovative approaches to refugee management. Through diverse perspectives and historical analysis, it traces the evolution of displacement, demonstrating how current crises mirror past events. For instance, Khan and Wara compare the Biharis trapped in Bangladesh after 1971's independence with today's Forcibly Displaced Myanmar Nationals (FDMN), highlighting how the 1982 Myanmar Citizenship Act echoes the Bihari situation, leaving people in legal limbo and forced to seek refuge. In another article, Khan focuses on present-day issues, such as mounting tensions in refugee management and the consequences for host communities, including prolonged refugee presence, conflicting socioeconomic interests, and declining social cohesion. Siddiqi and Khan examine the external shocks, including the COVID-19 pandemic and sudden migration emergencies, which exacerbate these challenges by hindering aid access and reducing job opportunities in camps. Pari-Bedoya examines the case of the Peru-Chile border crisis, using these examples to illustrate broader management crises and institutional barriers. Importantly, the collection advances evidence-based methodologies for refugee management, including innovative tools like blockchain for transparent and accessible resource allocation, as Abraha pointed out in his article. Bhuiyan critiques the prevailing notion of temporary encampment and argues for a proactive, life-course perspective that moves beyond survival toward lasting well-being for refugees and greater harmony with host communities.Although these analyses from the cases of the Global South supply scholars with rigorous research and evidence-driven recommendations to address modern humanitarian crises among displaced populations worldwide, global communities also need to pay attention to the ongoing challenges in hosting and managing the refugee population in these countries. In addition, global scholars and researchers need to bring more cases from various other places across the Global South to develop South-South collaboration and exchange learning for better refugee management, ensuring a peaceful and cohesive environment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».