FEATURES OF TIME MANAGEMENT IN THE LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article identifies the relevance of time management research in the land resources management system. The works of scientists are analyzed from the point of view of the importance of this issue, and the insufficiency of research on the identified issues in the land resources management system is clarified. The main stages of the development of time management are revealed, starting from the period of its emergence to the present day. It describes how the time management process is carried out in countries such as Germany, Denmark, America and Canada. The main aspects of time management in the land resources management system are revealed. It is established that an important aspect is the construction of the Eisenhower matrix for land use, which will contribute to the correct establishment of priorities in the land resources management system for the correct arrangement of tasks. It was found that the Eisenhower matrix involves taking into account such elements as urgent and important tasks that need to be completed immediately, solving important but not urgent tasks, solving urgent but not important tasks that can be delegated to other performers, and identifying tasks that need to be excluded from the top priorities. It was found that the construction of the Eisenhower matrix in the land management system contributes to a clearer distribution of tasks facing land owners and land users by degree of priority and importance. It has been determined that timing in the land resources management system will allow us to investigate the duration of individual operations, as well as the norms of main, auxiliary and operational time for performing relevant work in the land use system for the purpose of their effectiveness and productivity. The main criteria for time management have been established, such as organizing working hours, strategic planning with the correct arrangement of long-term goals and tasks to be completed, flexibility and adaptability, productivity through meeting deadlines, summing up and evaluating the effectiveness of the activities carried out. The results of the article could be used by agricultural organizations, subjects of agricultural management for substantiation of territorial development programs, local authorities and other agricultural subjects.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle