Segmentation-free pretherapeutic assessment of BRAF-status in pediatric low-grade gliomas
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BRAF status is crucial for treating pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) and can be assessed non-invasively from segmented tumor regions on MRI using machine learning (ML). However, there are limitations to manual and automated tumor segmentations. This study assessed the performance of automated segmentation algorithms and a segmentation-free ML classification pipeline. Molecularly characterized tumors and whole-brain FLAIR MR images were collected from 455 patients with pLGG treated between 1999 and 2023 at a children’s hospital. Three medical segmentation models, TransBTS, MedNeXt, and MedicalNet, were evaluated. Next, we developed a model to identify BRAF status from whole-brain FLAIR MRI, without any reliance on segmentations. We then implemented a novel pretraining regimen that embedded segmentation knowledge into the whole-brain FLAIR MRI classification model. Finally, we trained and evaluated a baseline model that used semiautomatic whole tumor volume segmentations as inputs. Here we show that the MedNeXt segmentation model (mean Dice score: 0.555) outperformed MedicalNet (0.516) and TransBTS (0.449) (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The MedNeXt classification model achieved a one-vs-rest area under the ROC curve of 0.741 using the whole brain FLAIR sequence as an input, without any segmentation knowledge. This was improved to 0.772 through pretraining on the segmentation task, which was not significantly different from the baseline semiautomatic whole tumor volume segmentation-based model (0.756, p-value: 0.141). BRAF status can be assessed non-invasively using ML models based on whole-brain FLAIR sequences. Dependence on inconsistent manual or automated segmentations can be reduced by integrating tumor region information into the model through pretraining. Pediatric low-grade gliomas are the most common brain tumors in children. Many of these tumors carry mutations in a gene called BRAF. Treatment choices depend on knowing the type of mutation, termed “BRAF status.” Up until now, BRAF status could only be confirmed through brain surgery or predicted from brain scans using artificial intelligence after first outlining the tumor on the scan. Tumors can be outlined manually by radiologists or automatically by a computer model, but both methods are prone to inconsistencies. In this study, we show that BRAF status can be predicted directly from brain scans using artificial intelligence without outlining, making the method more reliable and practical. This approach could help children avoid brain surgery and may extend to other cancers and age groups. Kudus et al. develop a segmentation-free deep learning pipeline to predict BRAF status in pediatric low-grade gliomas from whole-brain MRI. The model performs comparably to segmentation-based approaches, improves with pretraining, and is most accurate for identifying BRAF Fusion.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».