Correlation between Cognition, Functional Ability and Quality of Life in Older Adults having Subjective Cognitive Decline: A Cross-sectional Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) represents self-perceived cognitive impairment that may precede objective signs of cognitive decline. Exploring the association between cognition, functional ability, and Quality of Life (QoL) among older adults having SCD, will help in identification of at-risk population and tailor interventions. Aim: To investigate the association between cognition, functional ability and QoL among older adults having SCD across different Socioeconomic Status (SES) and gender. Materials and Methods: The present a cross-sectional study included data collected from the Outpatient Department (OPD) of a Rehabilitation Institution in Delhi,India between July 2023 to October 2023. Data from 130 older adults with SCD was taken by random sampling for cognition, functional ability, QoL and SES. Cognition was assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III). Functional ability was measured by Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (L-IADL) Scale, QoL {Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)} by SF-36 Health Survey and Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale was used to measure SES. Descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlations, and chi-square tests were used to explore the association between the variables. Results: SES was not significantly correlated with IADL (r=- 0.098, p=0.267), SF-36 scores (r=0.131, p=0.138), or ACE-III scores (r=0.145, p=0.099). In males, a statistically significant moderate positive correlation was found between MOCA and ACE-III scores (r=0.521, p<0.001), indicating consistency in cognitive assessment tools and no significant correlations were found between SES and MOCA (r=0.137, p=0.221), IADL (r=-0.076, p=0.502), or SF-36 scores (r=0.072, p=0.520). Among females, a statistically significant moderate-to-strong correlation was also observed between MOCA and ACE-III scores (r=0.546, p<0.001). Additionally, a weak but positive, nearly significant correlation was observed between SES and MOCA scores (r=0.255, p=0.078), indicating a possible trend. The correlation between SES and SF-36 was also weak and non-significant (r=0.212, p=0.143). Conclusion: A statistically significant moderate positive correlation was observed between MOCA scores and ACEIII scores. This indicates that participants who scored higher on the MOCA also tended to have higher ACE-III scores. The correlation between SES and MOCA score was weak and not statistically significant. Other variables did not show strong or statistically significant relationships.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,018 | 0,119 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».