[Sociodemographic, criminological and clinical profiles of perpetrators of domestic violence in France and Quebec: Comparative research].
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Domestic violence is now an international social issue. Although some countries have been slow to respond, many have developed interventions based on an empowerment approach. This article examines a number of psychological variables and their impact on the implementation of an accountability approach in a group of participants from France and Canada (Quebec). The variables examined are traumatic and dissociative symptoms, attachment and suicide risk. Although these factors are crucial, they have been little studied, even though they may have an impact on the quality of support provided to perpetrators of domestic violence. Objectives Our objectives were to identify the psycho-socio-criminological profiles of perpetrators of domestic violence who had attended a course or an intervention group. We also wanted to compare these two groups and their respective support in order to hypothesize about the implementation of an accountability process in relation to certain psychological variables. Method A total of 57 men were interviewed, 38 from France and 19 from Quebec, who completed questionnaires on attachment, suicide risk, traumatic and dissociative symptoms, and socio-demographic data. Results The French and Quebec groups of men were similar in terms of their socio-demographic profiles, but there were significant differences in the types of violence reported. The Quebec group reported more sexual violence than the French group, while the French group reported more physical violence than the Quebec group. There were no significant differences in the results of the questionnaires on attachment and suicide risk, but the questionnaires on traumatic and dissociative symptoms were significantly higher among the Quebec perpetrators of domestic violence. Conclusion These differences may be explained by differences in the recruitment sites, the level of self-reflection and the time between the act of violence and the research interview. Secondary prevention work needs to be carried out so that perpetrators of domestic violence can identify their difficulties and verbalise and mentalise the issues that affect them. In addition, the obligation to attend training courses on responsibility, as proposed in France, seems appropriate but not sufficient. Individual meetings with a counsellor or psychologist, as a complement to these courses or groups, could help to increase the level of responsibility for the act and encourage more in-depth work. This awareness could in turn reduce the risk of re-offending and intergenerational transmission.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».