[Sustainable Return to Work: What Leadership and Supportive Practices from Managers and Employers?]
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objectives The literature highlights the role of the manager in the successful return to work (RTW) after an absence due to common mental disorders (e.g., depressive disorders). However, few studies have specifically examined the influence of leadership style in this context, thus limiting the knowledge that could inform effective behaviors in organizational settings for sustainable RTW. This paper aims to examine the role of leadership and support practices developed by managers and employers in the context of RTW. Two studies are presented. The first study analyzes the influence of leadership style (transformational vs. authoritarian) and perceived organizational support on employees' retention after their RTW. The second study examines the extent to which managers and employers perceive their ability to implement practices recognized in the literature as promoting sustainable RTW. METHOD: In Study 1, 84 employees who had returned to work after a long-term sickness responded to an online questionnaire (Qualtrics). Among them, 70% were on sick leave due to a common mental disorder (CMD). In Study 2, which was international in scope, 30 employers and human resources managers and 28 managers responded to an online questionnaire (LimeSurvey). This questionnaire focused on RTW practices for employees on sick leave due to a CMD, covering the entire RTW sequence. RESULTS: Study 1: Multiple regression analysis highlights that transformational leadership plays a significant role in reducing burnout and the intention to leave the job, unlike authoritarian leadership, while enhancing the perception of organizational support. Furthermore, the mediating role of SOP and burnout in the effect of transformational leadership on the intention to leave has been demonstrated. Study 2: Descriptive analyses indicate that employers and human resources managers find it easier to communicate rules to the various RTW stakeholders within the organization. However, their self-efficacy is lower when it comes to supporting managers in implementing work accommodations for the affected employees. With respect to managers, they feel capable of establishing measures that promote the sustainable RTW of team members. However, they find it more challenging to adopt RTW practices during the employee's sick leave and to implement preventive measures for relapses. CONCLUSION: These two studies highlight the importance of supportive attitudes in job retention and identify areas of difficulty encountered by managers. The discussion presents research perspectives and recommendations to better support managers, employers, and human resources managers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».