Circlegrammetry for drone imaging: Evaluating a novel technique for mission planning and 3D mapping
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Circlegrammetry is a new drone photogrammetry technique that utilizes circular flight paths. This approach promises higher efficiency for 3D modelling compared to traditional grid-based methods. This study evaluates its performance in a Christmas tree (Balsam fir) field, a complex agricultural environment characterized by intricate vegetation geometry. Experiments were conducted in a 2-ha orchard located in Truro, Nova Scotia, using a DJI Matrice 300 RTK equipped with a high-resolution optical camera. Three Circlegrammetry missions with varying overlaps (25 and 50 %) and flight heights (40 and 60 m) were compared against standard oblique and smart oblique drone missions flown at an flight heights of 60 m. Mission assessments focused on flight efficiency, processing performance and reconstruction accuracy. The point density of the tree canopy, generated from dense point clouds, was also evaluated against different survey methods. Results demonstrated that Circlegrammetry significantly reduced flight times and the number of images required, particularly at lower overlap configurations. For example, Circlegrammetry with a 25 % overlap achieved mission completion in about half the time required for smart oblique methods and in approximately one-third the duration of standard oblique missions. Processing efficiency was similarly favoured by Circlegrammetry (25 % overlap), with notable reductions in processing times. In terms of reconstruction quality, Circlegrammetry produced spatially accurate models with ground-control RMSE values ranging from 1.38 to 1.53 cm. These results were comparable to those of traditional oblique methods, despite not utilizing nadir imagery. However, Circlegrammetry showed limitations in capturing lower canopy details on the tree, with an average point density higher than that of other methods. For example, Circle 25 % performed the worst, with an average point spacing of 15.79 points per millimetre for the lower canopy. In contrast, the standard oblique approach performed the best, with an average point spacing of 11.89 points per millimetre. This suggested some constraints inherent to the inward-facing of the camera and higher oblique-angle flight paths on Cirlegrammetry missions. Overall, Circlegrammetry emerges as a promising method for precision agriculture applications by striking a balance between flight efficiency and reconstruction detail. Circlegrammetry with a 50 % overlap was demonstrated to be a comparable alternative to the smart oblique acquisition method. Future research should focus on optimizing overlap percentages and flight configurations to improve lower canopy coverage further and generalize these findings across diverse agricultural contexts.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».