Effectiveness of an Educational and Counseling Program (the Green Mother Project Phase 2) to Enhance Breastfeeding and Improve Mothers’ Diets From an Environmental Perspective: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended as healthier and more sustainable than formula feeding. It produces less waste, requires fewer resources, and has a smaller environmental impact. Breastfeeding has some environmental impact related to increased maternal dietary needs and the use of feeding accessories. In light of the global climate emergency and suboptimal breastfeeding rates, targeted interventions are urgently needed to promote sustainable infant feeding practices. There are few studies that evaluate sustainability interventions in the postpartum period. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational and counseling intervention on breastfeeding and healthy maternal nutrition from an environmental perspective. METHODS: A multicenter prospective intervention study is being conducted in 2 cohorts in primary care centers and hospitals in the north metropolitan area of Barcelona. The control group received standard obstetric care. The experimental group additionally received an educational intervention and health care support on breastfeeding and healthy and sustainable maternal nutrition. Pregnant women were monitored from 24 weeks of gestation to 6 months post partum. The rates of different types of breastfeeding, the women's diet, and the associated environmental impacts (climate change and water footprint) will be analyzed to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. RESULTS: The development of the educational and counseling intervention has been completed, including the creation of the Guide to Good Practices in Breastfeeding, Nutrition, and Sustainability. Health care professionals received targeted training. Recruitment of pregnant women was conducted from December 2023 to December 2024. Prenatal education sessions and specialized care pathways were designed and implemented. Breastfeeding-friendly spaces were adapted to support the participating centers. Data collection for monitoring breastfeeding practices, maternal diet, and environmental impact indicators (carbon footprint and water footprint), with the follow-up period of 6 months post partum, was extended until September 2025, with a complementary missing data collection in October 2025. Data cleaning for final analysis is expected to conclude by January 2026. This study hypothesizes that mothers who receive higher levels of education and counseling support will (1) breastfeed for a longer duration, (2) adopt healthier and more sustainable dietary practices, and (3) reduce environmental impacts associated with both infant feeding accessories and dietary choices. CONCLUSIONS: We expect an increase in the incidence and prevalence rates of breastfeeding and a shift toward a healthy and sustainable diet with low environmental impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05729581; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05729581. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/80358.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,027 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,015 | 0,006 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,052 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».