107.8: Developing a coping strategies toolkit for organ and tissue donation coordinators: A quality improvement initiative.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Organ and tissue donation coordinators, often with backgrounds in acute and critical care (ACC) nursing, face unique workplace stressors in their critical roles. These professionals manage emotionally charged, complex situations, which can lead to significant stress and burnout. Despite the need for effective coping strategies to maintain their well-being, there is a lack of targeted support mechanisms in the field. This quality improvement initiative aims to develop a toolkit designed to enhance coping strategies for organ and tissue donation coordinators, informed by a scoping review focused on ACC RNs due to the scarcity of specific literature on donation coordinators. Method: Multi-phased research consisting of (1) Scoping Review - completed, and (2) Toolkit Development - ongoing. A scoping review was conducted following the JBI methodology, encompassing major databases such as Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The review focused on coping strategies employed by RNs in ACC settings to manage workplace stressors. A total of 168 documents published between 2003 and 2023 were included, with data analyzed by two independent reviewers. Based on these findings, we are in the process of developing a comprehensive toolkit that integrates evidence-based coping mechanisms identified in the review. This toolkit will be tailored to the unique challenges faced by organ and tissue donation coordinators, incorporating problem-focused, emotion-focused, meaning-focused, and support-seeking approaches. Results: The review identified a range of stressors experienced by RNs, including high workloads, inadequate staffing, insufficient support, and environmental challenges. The coping strategies identified were categorized into problem-focused, emotion-focused, meaning-focused, and support-seeking approaches. Social support and organizational resources were key facilitators of effective coping, while workload pressures and lack of institutional support acted as barriers. The development of the toolkit is underway, and it will include practical tools for stress management, organizational support strategies, and methods to foster a supportive work environment. Conclusion: The toolkit, once developed and implemented, aims to significantly reduce burnout, enhance job satisfaction, and improve overall performance among organ and tissue donation coordinators. By providing evidence-based coping mechanisms and fostering a supportive organizational culture, the initiative will contribute to better outcomes in organ and tissue donation processes and promote the well-being of professionals dedicated to this critical work. This quality improvement strategy has the potential to impact the field by addressing the unique challenges faced by donation coordinators and offering targeted support for their well-being.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».