MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4416918368 · doi:10.65237/2336-3630-2025-12(1)-10

FACTORS OF FORMING THE EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE OF ADOLESCENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF GENDER-SPECIFICITY OF SOCIALIZATION AND UPBRINGING

2025· article· W4416918368 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lutsenko, Byrin

Notice bibliographique

RevueMiddle European Scientific Bulletin · 2025
Typearticle
Langue
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePsychology of Development and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEmotional intelligenceEmotional expressionSocializationNormativeFemininityContext (archaeology)Emotional competenceEmotionalitySociocultural evolutionConstructive

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The emotional intelligence of adolescents is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that is formed under the influence of biological, social, and cultural factors. During adolescence, which is characterized by intense psycho-emotional changes, the search for one's own identity and the need for social acceptance, the development of emotional intelligence becomes particularly relevant. The ability to recognize, understand, and regulate one's own emotions and the emotions of others is a key factor in emotional stability, constructive interaction with the environment, and the formation of social competence. Gender differences in the development of emotional intelligence are manifested in the specificity of emotional perception, expression of emotions, and the ability to experience emotions and empathy. Girls usually demonstrate greater sensitivity to emotional experiences and a tendency to emotional reflection, while boys are more often characterized by a lower level of emotional regulation and a tendency to external expression. These differences are caused not only by biological factors, such as hormonal changes and the peculiarities of the functioning of the nervous system, but also by sociocultural processes, among which socialization and upbringing play a key role. They are the ones that transmit normative models of emotional expression, adaptive self-regulation strategies, and acceptable boundaries of affective response in accordance with the gender expectations of society. Gender socialization, as a specific form of socialization, is aimed at the individual's assimilation of those emotional and behavioral scenarios that correspond to socially constructed ideas about femininity and masculinity. It determines which emotions are considered acceptable for boys and girls, and forms strategies for emotional self-expression and regulation. A promising area of research is the development and testing of programs for the development of emotional intelligence, taking into account gender differences, studying the impact of digital media on the emotional development of adolescents, and searching for effective models of upbringing that contribute to harmonious development regardless of gender. The integration of the results of such studies into the practice of inclusive and general education can significantly improve the effectiveness of psychological and pedagogical support for adolescents, help them better adapt to social requirements and norms, and ensure the formation of a mature personal position. Thus, emotional intelligence appears not only as an individual characteristic but as a socially conditioned construct, the development of which requires a comprehensive approach that takes into account biological, social, and cultural factors, as well as gender aspects of socialization and upbringing. References 1. Avgustyuk M. M. (2022). Metodychni porady do pidvyshchennia rivnia emotsiinoho intelektu v zdobuvachiv vyshchoi osvity [Methodical advice for increasing the level of emotional intelligence in higher education applicants]. Ostroh: Publishing House of the National University "Ostroh Academy" [in Ukraine] 2. Afanasenko V., Bondarenko V., Buzivska V. (2024). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti rozvytku emotsiinoho intelektu v pidlitkovomu vitsi [Psychological features of the development of emotional intelligence in adolescence]. XXVI International Scientific and Practical Conference "Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Modern Research" (June 5–7, 2024, Ottawa, Canada), 255–259 [in Ukraine] 3. Bibler V. (2018). Dialoh kultur [Dialogue of Cultures]. Kyiv: Spirit and Literature [in Ukraine] 4. Borysyuk A. S., Radchuk V. M., Lyubina L. A. (2018). Psykhodiahnostyka [Psychodiagnostics: teaching]. Manual, Chernivtsi: Yavorskyi S. N. [in Ukraine] 5. Byalkovska A. D., Semenkova A. M. (2023). Formuvannia emotsiinoho intelektu yak profesiinoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh fakhivtsiv iz sotsialnoi roboty [Formation of emotional intelligence as a professional competence of future social work specialists]. Current research in the social sphere: materials of the 22nd international scientific and practical conference (Odesa, November 17, 2023), 175–176 [in Ukraine] 6. Demchuk V. (2024). Etapy ta pedahohichni umovy rozvytku emotsiinoho intelektu pidlitkiv u protsesi tvorchoi diialnosti [Stages and pedagogical conditions for the development of emotional intelligence in adolescents in the process of creative activity]. Innovation in education, 216–225. 7. Lesch O. P. (2021). Heneza emotsiinoho intelektu v yunatskomu vitsi [The genesis of emotional intelligence in adolescence]: dissertation ... of Dr. Psychology. Kyiv 8. Mazokha I. (2020). Analiz problemy emotsiinoho intelektu yak osobystisnoho resursu. Suchasna psykholohiia: problemy ta perspektyvy [Analysis of the problem of emotional intelligence as a personal resource. Contemporary Psychology]: Issues and Prospects, 100–104 9. Bandura A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 10. Bussey K., Bandura A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 676–713

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,368
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,576

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,111
Tête enseignante GPT0,314
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMiddle European Scientific BulletinMême sujetPsychology of Development and EducationTravaux en français237 207