MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4416944273 · doi:10.21154/dialogia.v23i02.11208

Rationality in Digital Da'wah

2025· article· W4416944273 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muhammad Ikram Firda

Notice bibliographique

RevueDialogia · 2025
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIslamic Finance and Communication
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDialogicDialogical selfRationalityConversationCredibilityIslamObject (grammar)Critical discourse analysis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The lack of studies on logic-based da'wah strategies in digital conversation formats is an important gap in contemporary religious communication studies. This article aims to analyze how a rational approach is used in delivering Islamic messages through the YouTube podcast "Belajar Islam Pake Logika" with Felix Siauw and Raymond Chin. This study employs a qualitative approach in which descriptive procedures are used to organize the data, while Fairclough’s critical discourse study serves as the primary analytical framework. The object of study is the content of conversations in podcasts lasting more than one hour, with data in the form of complete transcripts obtained through documentation and non-intervention observation. The analysis was conducted through three stages: text analysis, discursive practices, and social practices. The findings show that logical argumentation, dialogic style, and social criticism are used as the main strategies of da'wah to build credibility and reach critical audiences. The findings indicate that rationality functions as a discursive resource that restructures how religious authority is articulated in digital media. This expands the theoretical understanding of da'wah communication by showing that meaning-making in contemporary Islamic discourse increasingly depends on dialogical reasoning rather than hierarchical textual claims. REFERENCES D’Ambrosio, Mariangela. “Emotions in Political Discourse and Social Narratives: Sociological Reflections on Traditional and New Media.” Society Register 6, no. 4 (2022): 101–16. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2022.6.4.06. Eka Arie Yuliyani, Hamsu Kadriyan, Mochammad Alfian Sulaksana, et al. “Edukasi Sadar Bising Sebagai Upaya Promotif Dan Preventif Terhadap Gangguan Dengar Melalui Media Podcast.” Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA 5, no. 2 (2022): 89–93. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpmpi.v5i2.1630. Elashrey, Mohamed Elsayed Ibrahim. “A Stylistic Approach to Power Relation Shifts in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible.” مجلة کلیة الآداب .جامعة بورسعید 21, no. 21 (2022): 22–40. https://doi.org/10.21608/jfpsu.2021.74436.1087. Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis. 0 ed. Routledge, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368. Fattahizadeh, Fathyieh and Fereshteh Motamad Langrodi. “Application of Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis Model to Quranic Verses Discussing Peaceful Dealing with Hypocrites.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 12, no. 1 (2022): 231–46. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.121.13. Fattahizadeh, Fathyieh and Fereshteh Motamad Langrodi. “Application of Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis Model to Quranic Verses Discussing Peaceful Dealing with Hypocrites.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 12, no. 1 (2022): 231–46. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.121.13. Gee, James Paul, and Michael Handford. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244. Guihua, Luo, and Liu Mi. “The Concepts of Discourse and the Theoretical Genealogy of Discourse Analysis.” Social Science Research Frontiers, ahead of print, April 25, 2023. https://doi.org/10.57237/j.ssrf.2023.02.003. Harahap, Anjelin Rahmi Junaidi, Muhammad Fathurrahman Al-Anshori, and Kartini Kartini. “Metode Analisis Wacana Dalam Media Sosial.” Dakwatussifa: Journal of Da’wah and Communication 1, no. 2 (2022): 105–15. https://doi.org/10.56146/dakwatussifa.v1i2.54. Institute of Socio-Political Research of the Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences (ISPR FCTAS RAS), Nina A. Seliverstova, Julia A. Zubok, and Institute of Socio-Political Research of the Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences (ISPR FCTAS RAS). “Religious Identity in the Semantic Self-Regulation of Youth.” Research Result Sociology and Management 9, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2023-9-2-0-10. Khadiq. “Transformation of Islamic Religious Practices in the Digital Era: Opportunities and Challenges for Contemporary Da’wah.” Jurnal Dakwah 24, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.14421/jd.2023.24205. Li, Wengqian, and W. Shi. “English Advertising Slogans: A Modality System Analysis.” Asian Journal of Multilingualism and Applied Linguistics 1, no. 1 (2022): 25–29. https://doi.org/10.53402/ajmal.v1i1.61. Ligawan, Andry Saputra. “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RELIGION AND THE STATE: DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF RELIGIOUS COMMUNICATION IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE.” Jurnal Bioconcetta 9, no. 2 (2024): 57–62. https://doi.org/10.22202/bc.2023.v9i2.7728. Lubis, Nikmah. “Intersection of Traditional Religious Authority and New Authority in the Digital Space of Indonesia.” FIKRAH 11, no. 1 (2023): 135. https://doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v11i1.19678. Makhloufi, Imane Belkacem Mohammed. “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Modality in COVID-19 Speeches: A Systemic Functional Grammar Perspective.” Jordanian Educational Journal 10, no. 1 (2025): 331–53. https://doi.org/10.46515/jaes.v10i1.1332. Masasa, Karina. “The Role of Trust in the Discursive Construction of Legitimacy and Authority. The First Address on Covid-19 in Argentina.” Argumentation et Analyse Du Discours 28 (2022). https://doi.org/10.4000/aad.6480. Mattes, Mark. “Faith and Reason in the Reformations Ed. by Terence J. Kleven.” Lutheran Quarterly 36, no. 4 (2022): 454–56. https://doi.org/10.1353/lut.2022.0106. Mukhtidinov, Rashid. “Da’wah and Counter-Radicalism in Indonesia.” Dakwatuna: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi Islam 9, no. 1 (2023): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.54471/dakwatuna.v9i1.2246. Nasution, Nadya Amalia and Alisya. “Islamic Leadership Narratives on YouTube: A Framing Analysis of Digital Da’wah Messages.” Ath-Thariq: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi 8, no. 2 (2024): 116–27. https://doi.org/10.32332/ath-thariq.v8i2.8sw96g96. Nesterova, Natalia, and Anastasia Oreshkina. “The Paper Explores New Discursive Practices Determined by Media Convergence and New Communication Conditions. Based on the Case Study of the Program ‘We Speak Russian’ and the Podcast ‘What Is It in Russian?’ The Following Dynamic Changes Have Been Ident.” Philology & Human, no. 4 (December 2022): 26–42. https://doi.org/10.14258/filichel(2022)4-02. Nurul Khotimah and Fitri Shafa Kamila. “The Trends of Digital Da’wah: Cyber Media Analysis on Instagram Account.” Proceedings of the Saizu International Conference on Transdisciplinary Religious Studies, November 15, 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24090/icontrees.2022.217. Nurul Sulfiani, Munirah Munirah, and Haslinda Haslinda. “Analisis Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Dalam Podcast Deddy Corbuzier Dan Nadiem Makarim Pada Media Sosial Youtube.” DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra 2, no. 2 (2022): 114–28. https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v2i2.251. Purwatiningsih, Sri Desti, and Sri Ekowati. “Interfaith Debate Through YouTube Media as an Effort to Educate and Fortify the Faith of the Ummah.” Technium Social Sciences Journal 30 (April 2022): 271–81. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v30i1.6246. “Religion, Rationality and Justice – A Cause for Critical Reflection in the Contemporary Society.” Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies 2, no. 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i4.51. Ross Arguedas, Amy A., Sumitra Badrinathan, Camila Mont’Alverne, Benjamin Toff, Richard Fletcher, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. “‘It’s a Battle You Are Never Going to Win’: Perspectives from Journalists in Four Countries on How Digital Media Platforms Undermine Trust in News.” Journalism Studies 23, no. 14 (2022): 1821–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2112908. Sánchez-López, Elena. “Meaning, Degrees of Abstraction and Shared Knowledge.” In IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, edited by Susana Rodríguez Rosique and Jordi M. Antolí Martínez, vol. 34. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.34.13san. Saragih, Ahmad Faza Fauzan, Rony Fernando Sagala, and Erwan Effendi. “Peran Media Sosial Dalam Membangun Dakwah Islam Yang Efektif.” Dakwatussifa: Journal of Da’wah and Communication 1, no. 2 (2022): 141–51. https://doi.org/10.56146/dakwatussifa.v1i2.59. Sharon, Tzlil. “Peeling the Pod: Towards a Research Agenda for Podcast Studies.” Annals of the International Communication Association 47, no. 3 (2023): 324–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2201593. Utomo, Deni Puji, and Rachmat Adiwijaya. “Representasi Moderasi Beragama Dalam Dakwah Habib Husein Ja’far Al-Hadar Pada Konten Podcast Noice ‘Berbeda Tapi Bersama.’” PUSAKA 10, no. 1 (2022): 212–23. https://doi.org/10.31969/pusaka.v10i1.675. Wu, Haibin. “Identity Construction through Lexical Choices: A Corpus-Based Approach.” Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science 7, no. 2 (2023): 401–7. https://doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2023.02.028. Zaid, Bouziane, Jana Fedtke, Don Donghee Shin, Abdelmalek El Kadoussi, and Mohammed Ibahrine. “Digital Islam and Muslim Millennials: How Social Media Influencers Reimagine Religious Authority and Islamic Practices.” Religions 13, no. 4 (2022): 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040335.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,557
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,478

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDialogiaMême sujetIslamic Finance and CommunicationTravaux en français237 207